Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-11-02 Thread Ben Bromhead
We are not publishing the build artefacts for our LTS at the moment as we don't test them on the different distros (debian/ubuntu, centos etc). If anyone wishes to do so feel free to create a PR and submit them! On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 at 11:37 Jesse Hodges wrote: > awesome, thanks for the tip! > > -

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-11-02 Thread Jesse Hodges
awesome, thanks for the tip! -Jesse On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Roth wrote: > You can build one on your own very easily. Just check out the desired git > repo and do this: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8989192/how-to- > package-the-cassandra-source-code-into-debian-packag

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-11-02 Thread Benjamin Roth
You can build one on your own very easily. Just check out the desired git repo and do this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8989192/how-to-package-the-cassandra-source-code-into-debian-package 2016-11-02 17:35 GMT+01:00 Jesse Hodges : > Just curious, has anybody created a debian package for t

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-11-02 Thread Jesse Hodges
Just curious, has anybody created a debian package for this? Thanks, Jesse On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Kai Wang wrote: > This is awesome! Stability is the king. > > Thank you so much! > > On Oct 19, 2016 2:56 PM, "Ben Bromhead" wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I am proud to announce we are making

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-22 Thread Kai Wang
This is awesome! Stability is the king. Thank you so much! On Oct 19, 2016 2:56 PM, "Ben Bromhead" wrote: > Hi All > > I am proud to announce we are making available our production build of > Cassandra 3.7 that we run at Instaclustr (both for ourselves and our > customers). Our release of Cassa

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-20 Thread sankalp kohli
I will also publish 3.0 back ports once we are running 3.0 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what > you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions > e.g. 2.2). It's great to compar

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-20 Thread Ben Bromhead
Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions e.g. 2.2). It's great to compare notes. On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 16:19 sankalp kohli wrote: > This is awesome. I have send out the patches which we bac

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-20 Thread sankalp kohli
This is awesome. I have send out the patches which we back ported into 2.1 on the dev list. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, kurt Greaves wrote: > > On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems >> to be wid

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread kurt Greaves
On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If > not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. There has certainly be

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread Jonathan Haddad
Awesome! On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:57 PM Jason J. W. Williams < jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:07 PM, sfesc...@gmail.com > wrote: > > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the wh

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
+1 On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:07 PM, sfesc...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If > not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. > > Steve > > On

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread sfesc...@gmail.com
Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. Steve On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM Matija Gobec wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread Matija Gobec
Hi Ben, Thanks for this awesome contribution. I'm eager to give it a try and test it out. Best, Matija On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Hi All > > I am proud to announce we are making available our production build of > Cassandra 3.7 that we run at Instaclustr (both for o

Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

2016-10-19 Thread Ben Bromhead
Hi All I am proud to announce we are making available our production build of Cassandra 3.7 that we run at Instaclustr (both for ourselves and our customers). Our release of Cassandra 3.7 includes a number of backported patches from later versions of Cassandra e.g. 3.8 and 3.9 but doesn't include