Thanks a lot Steve.
I suspected the same. I will definitely read.
regards
Neha
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Steve Robenalt
wrote:
> Hi Neha,
>
> As far as I'm aware, 4GB of RAM is a bit underpowered for Cassandra even
> if there are no other processes on the same server (i.e. Tomcat and
>
Hi Neha,
As far as I'm aware, 4GB of RAM is a bit underpowered for Cassandra even if
there are no other processes on the same server (i.e. Tomcat and ActiveMQ).
There are some general guidelines at
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraHardware which should help you
out. You may not need all o
Hello Everyone,
Thanks very much for the input.
Here is my System info.
1. I have single node cluster. (For testing)
2. I have 4GB Memory on the Server and trying to process 200B. ( 1GB is
allocated to Tomcat7, 1 GB to Cassandra and 1 GB to ActiveMQ. Also nltk
Server is running)
3. We are using 2.
I agree with Rob. You shouldn't need to change the read timeout.
We had similar issues with intermittent ReadTimeoutExceptions for a while
when we ran Cassandra on underpowered nodes on AWS. We've also seen them
when executing unconstrained queries with very large ResultSets (because it
takes long
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Asit KAUSHIK
wrote:
> There are some values for read timeout in Cassandra.yaml file and the
> default value is 3 ms change to a bigger value and that resolved our
> issue.
>
Having to increase this value is often a strong signal you are Doing It
Wrong. FWIW!
There are some values for read timeout in Cassandra.yaml file and the
default value is 3 ms change to a bigger value and that resolved our
issue.
Hope this helps
Regards
Asit
On Jan 22, 2015 8:36 AM, "Neha Trivedi" wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I am trying to process 200MB file. I am getting follo
Hello All,
I am trying to process 200MB file. I am getting following Error. We are
using (apache-cassandra-2.0.3.jar)
com.datastax.driver.core.
exceptions.ReadTimeoutException: Cassandra timeout during read query at
consistency ONE (1 responses were required but only 0 replica responded)
1. Is it
