Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Ben Gambley
uces a layer of abstraction that, at best > negates those optimizations, and at worst introduces additional overhead. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Kanwar Sangha wrote: > > Ok. What would be the drawbacks J > > ** ** > > *From:* Micha

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Jared Biel
rst introduces additional overhead. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Kanwar Sangha wrote: >> >> Ok. What would be the drawbacks J >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Michael Kjellman >> [mailto:mkjell...@barr

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Morris
wrote: > > Ok. What would be the drawbacks J > > ** ** > > *From:* Michael Kjellman > [mailto:mkjell...@barracuda.com] > > *Sent:* 21 February 2013 17:12 > *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Cassandra with SAN > > ** ** > > No, this is a r

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
at 6:42 PM, Kanwar Sangha wrote: > >> Ok. What would be the drawbacks J >> >> From: Michael Kjellman [mailto:mkjell...@barracuda.com] >> Sent: 21 February 2013 17:12 >> To: user@cassandra.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Cassandra with SAN >> >> No, thi

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
, Kanwar Sangha wrote: > Ok. What would be the drawbacks J > > From: Michael Kjellman [mailto:mkjell...@barracuda.com] > Sent: 21 February 2013 17:12 > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cassandra with SAN > > No, this is a really really bad idea and C* was n

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Kjellman
uot;user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:42 PM To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Subject: RE

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread David Schairer
PM, Kanwar Sangha wrote: > Ok. What would be the drawbacks J > > From: Michael Kjellman [mailto:mkjell...@barracuda.com] > Sent: 21 February 2013 17:12 > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cassandra with SAN > > No, this is a really really bad idea and C* was not

RE: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Kanwar Sangha
Ok. What would be the drawbacks :) From: Michael Kjellman [mailto:mkjell...@barracuda.com] Sent: 21 February 2013 17:12 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Cassandra with SAN No, this is a really really bad idea and C* was not designed for this, in fact, it was designed so you don't

Re: Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Kjellman
uot; mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Subject: Cassandra with SAN Hi – Is it a good idea to use Cassandra with SAN ? Say a SAN which provides me 8 Petabytes of storage. Would I not be I/O bound irrespective of the no of Cassandra machines and scaling by adding machines won’t help ?

Cassandra with SAN

2013-02-21 Thread Kanwar Sangha
Hi - Is it a good idea to use Cassandra with SAN ? Say a SAN which provides me 8 Petabytes of storage. Would I not be I/O bound irrespective of the no of Cassandra machines and scaling by adding machines won't help ? Thanks Kanwar