On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Rene Kochen
wrote:
> This large batch_mutate took 5 seconds in Cassandra 1.0.11
> The same batch_mutate takes three minutes in Cassandra 1.2.18
>
Doesn't seem normal to me. But large batch_mutates are generally considered
an anti-pattern...
=Rob
Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with my client on Cassandra 1.2.18 which I did not have
> on Cassandra 1.0.11
>
> I create a big row with a lot of super-columns.
>
> When writing that row using batch_mutate, I receive the following error in
> my client:
>
> "A
Hi all,
I have a problem with my client on Cassandra 1.2.18 which I did not have on
Cassandra 1.0.11
I create a big row with a lot of super-columns.
When writing that row using batch_mutate, I receive the following error in
my client:
"A connection attempt failed because the connected
