Re: is primary key( foo, bar) the same as primary key ( foo ) with a ‘set' of bars?

2015-01-04 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Le 04/01/2015 11:52, Sylvain Lebresne a écrit : On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Sylvain Wallez <mailto:sylv...@apache.org>> wrote: Indeed this makes sense for map keys and set values, but AFAIU from the docs this also applies to map and list _values_: " The maximum s

Re: is primary key( foo, bar) the same as primary key ( foo ) with a ‘set' of bars?

2015-01-03 Thread Sylvain Wallez
nts and key map, because they are part of the internal column name that is itself limited to 64K)." -- Jack Krupansky On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Sylvain Wallez <mailto:sylv...@apache.org>> wrote: From what I understand from the docs, the 64k limit applies to both the number

Re: is primary key( foo, bar) the same as primary key ( foo ) with a ‘set' of bars?

2015-01-03 Thread Sylvain Wallez
n Francisco, CA* blog:**http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com> -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net