I see the same thing here. I have tried to do some maths including
timestamps, columns name, keys and raw data but in the end cassandra reports
a cluster size from 2 to 3 times bigger than the raw data. I am surely
missing something in my formula + i have a lot of free hard drive space, so
it's not
ven after
> that, but a couple of days later, it's looking pretty uneven.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jordan Pittier - Rezel > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Have you tried nodetool repair (or cleanup) on your nodes ?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010
Hi,
Have you tried nodetool repair (or cleanup) on your nodes ?
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:16 PM, James Golick wrote:
> I just increased my cluster from 2 to 4 nodes, and RF=2 to RF=3, using RP.
>
> The tokens seem pretty even on the ring, but two of the nodes are far more
> heavily loaded than t
Hi,
Regarding point c), you should ask your self, "what is good performance for
me ?". The read performance mainly depends on how fast your hard drives are
and how many rows you can maintain in cache. With such a small cluster, if
you want "good" read performance, you better have fast hard drive an
For sure you have to pay particular attention to memory allocation on each
node, especially be sure your servers dont swap. Then you can monitor how
load are balanced among your nodes (nodetools -h XX ring).
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:46 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> If you have 3-4 nodes, how do you mon
