...they have a somewhat different conflict/repair resolutions, too.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 8:06 PM, DuyHai Doan wrote:
> Storage-engine wise, they are almost equivalent, thought there are some
> minor differences:
> 1) with Set structure, you cannot store more that 64kb worth of data
> 2) collec
AH!!! I had forgotten about both of those issues. Good points..
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 11:04 AM, DuyHai Doan wrote:
> Storage-engine wise, they are almost equivalent, thought there are some
> minor differences:
>
> 1) with Set structure, you cannot store more that 64kb worth of data
> 2) collec
Storage-engine wise, they are almost equivalent, thought there are some
minor differences:
1) with Set structure, you cannot store more that 64kb worth of data
2) collections and maps are loaded entirely by Cassandra for each query,
whereas with clustering columns you can select a slice of columns
I think the two tables are the same. Correct?
create table foo (
source text,
target text,
primary key( source, target )
)
vs
create table foo (
source text,
target set,
primary key( source )
)
… meaning that the first one, under the covers is represented the same as
Use 2.0.11 for production
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Ajay wrote:
>
>> For my research and learning I am using Cassandra 2.1.2. But I see couple
>> of mail threads going on issues in 2.1.2. So what is the stable or popular
>> build for
