>
> It depends on what partitioner you use. You should be using the
> RandomPartitioner, and if so, the rows are sorted by the hash of the row
> key. there are partitioners that sort based on the raw key value but these
> partitioners shouldn't be used as they have problems due to uneven
> partitio
While in memory cassandra calls it a MemTable, but yes sstables are
write-once, and later combined with others into new ones thru compaction.
On 07/13/2012 09:54 PM, Michael Theroux wrote:
Thanks for the information,
So is the SStable essentially kept in memory, then sorted and written to di
Thanks for the information,
So is the SStable essentially kept in memory, then sorted and written to disk
on flush? After that point, an SStable is not modified, but can be written to
another SStable through compaction?
-Mike
On Jul 13, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Rob Coli wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 201
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> It depends on what partitioner you use. You should be using the
> RandomPartitioner, and if so, the rows are sorted by the hash of the row
> key. there are partitioners that sort based on the raw key value but these
> partitioners shouldn't be
On 07/13/2012 08:00 PM, Michael Theroux wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to understand in greater detail how SStables are stored, and
how information is transferred between Cassandra nodes, especially when a new
node is joining a cluster.
Specifically, Is information stored to SStables ordered
Hello,
I've been trying to understand in greater detail how SStables are stored, and
how information is transferred between Cassandra nodes, especially when a new
node is joining a cluster.
Specifically, Is information stored to SStables ordered by rowkeys? Some of
the articles I've read sugg
I was able to apply the patch in the cited bug report to the public source for
version 1.1.2. It seemed pretty straightforward; six lines in
MigrationManager.java were switched from System.currentTimeMillis() to
FBUtilities.timestampMicros(). I then re-built the project by running 'ant
artifact
DataStax would like to recognize individuals who go above and beyond
in their contributions to Apache Cassandra. To formalize this a
little bit, we're creating an MVP program, the first of which will be
announced at the Cassandra summit [1] in August.
To make this program a success, we need your
Hi all,
The 2012 Cassandra Summit will be in San Jose on August 8. The 2011
Summit sold out with almost 500 attendees; this year we found a bigger
venue to accommodate 700+. It's fantastic to see the Cassandra
community grow like this!
The 2012 Summit will have *four* talk tracks, plus the popu
Any chance your server has been running for the last two weeks with the
leap second bug?
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/linux-cassandra-and-saturdays-leap-second-problem
-Tupshin
On Jul 12, 2012 1:43 PM, "Leonid Ilyevsky"
wrote:
> I am loading a large set of data into a CF with composite key.
It sounds plausible that is what we are running into. All of our nodes report a
replication factor of 2 (both using describe, and show schema), even though the
cluster reported that all schemas agree after I issued the change to 4.
If this is related to the bug that you filed, it might also expl
Thank you Aaron and Brian. We're currently investigating several options.
Hadoop + Hive combo also seems a good choice as our input files are flat.
I'll keep you up-to-date about our final decision.
- Robin
2012/7/6 aaron morton
> Here are two links I've noticed in my travels, have not looked i
Hello everyone,
I'm facing quite weird problem with Cassandra since we've added
secondary DC to our cluster and have totally ran out of ideas; this
email is a call for help/advice!
History looks like:
- we used to have 4 nodes in a single DC
- running Cassandra 0.8.7
- RF:3
- around 50GB of data
Hi
Just wanted to say that it worked. I also made sure to modify thrift
rpc_port and storage port so that the two clusters don't interfere.
Thanks for the suggestion
Thanks
Rohit
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, aaron morton wrote:
> Since replication factor is 2 in first cluster, I
> won't lo
14 matches
Mail list logo