On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Even if it isn't the right verb, a simple on your source
>> fileset would already do if it knew how to append - as would
>> with a nested . I'd probably prefer the
>> approach since an
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Even if it isn't the right verb, a simple on
> your source
> fileset would already do if it knew how to append -
> as would
> with a nested . I'd probably prefer the
> approach
> since an appending copy sounds strange.
OT: I was thinking
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You said: "...you want to express yourself in loops while Ant wants
> to work on collections." This is most certainly true! But how do I
> express what I want to do in this particular case, as an operation
> on a collection?
Even i
Richard,
If you really need strong scripting support for your builds, perhaps you
should consider using Gravy (Groovy + Ant). This will give you all the power
of scripting with Groovy and Java and still allow you to utilize all the Ant
Task functionality that's already been built. And it's al
---
Ant (or make) is not a general purpose scripting language!
Mr. Bourne wrote a pretty good scripting language.
Yes, but sh (& friends) are not installed by default on Windows, and
hence, scripts written for them aren't portable... In make (which isn't
portable, I know), you can basically
Ant (or make) is not a general purpose scripting language!
Mr. Bourne wrote a pretty good scripting language.
There are a number of issues with using ant as a scripting language:
- there is no pipe like mechanism
- the tasks are not ortoginal (concat has different parameters than
copy for example)
--- Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried using and , but found that I
> couldn't do much with
> , as it appeared that the only way I could set
> the var was with the
> task, and I needed to use functionality in
> to get
> double-redirection. I can't *quite* recall why this
> d
--- Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From my reading of the documentation,
> doesn't allow nested
> s.
Yes, I meant "in the future when *I* add the
capability to to allow nested s,
this will be easy."
Sorry for the confusion. :)
-Matt
_
10/04/2004 09:16 PM
Please respond to "Ant Users List"
To: Ant Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Thinking in Ant...
As a matter of curiosity, whenever a nested
element gets added to , a builtin
solution will exist to the given pr
ssell
Deutsche Bank AG London
Global Markets Customer Solutions
Office: +44 (0)20 7545 8060
Mobile: +44 (0)79 0661 2237
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/04/2004 09:11 PM
Please respond to "Ant Users List"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
sell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I run into these issues so regularly that I cannot
> help but assume
> > that I am simply not 'thinking in Ant', and am
> therefore fighting
> > against its design rather than working with it.
>
> Sounds like it.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run into these issues so regularly that I cannot help but assume
> that I am simply not 'thinking in Ant', and am therefore fighting
> against its design rather than working with it.
Sounds like it.
One
problems getting along with Ant. I keep wanting to do
things that it appears that Ant can't do, despite trying to use what I
would consider fairly basic constructs. I run into these issues so
regularly that I cannot help but assume that I am simply not 'thinking in
Ant', and am
We are presently locked in to Ant, and moving away from it, while it would
be a big job technically, would be a monumental job politically. We also
require the Windows/Unix portability, and installing Cygwin is not an
option, so shell scripts won't work for us. I haven't really looked into
the
g to use what I
would consider fairly basic constructs. I run into these issues so
regularly that I cannot help but assume that I am simply not 'thinking in
Ant', and am therefore fighting against its design rather than working
with it. I occasionally come across snippets of documenta
I
would consider fairly basic constructs. I run into these issues so
regularly that I cannot help but assume that I am simply not 'thinking in
Ant', and am therefore fighting against its design rather than working
with it. I occasionally come across snippets of documentation that seem to
16 matches
Mail list logo
