On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Julien LF wrote:
>> 2011/8/18 Stefan Bodewig :
>> Depends on which version of Ant you use. Unless it is 1.8.2 upgrading
>> could help as we've improved scanning perfromance with almost every
>> release.
>
> I have some environments stuck with Java 1.3 so i planned
> 2011/8/18 Stefan Bodewig :
> Depends on which version of Ant you use. Unless it is 1.8.2 upgrading
> could help as we've improved scanning perfromance with almost every
> release.
I have some environments stuck with Java 1.3 so i planned to use Ant 1.7.1.
I gave Ant 1.8.2 a try (I should have t
On 2011-08-18, Julien LF wrote:
> That is, I'm using ant to build a tar archive of a directory
> containing 100,000+ files, and the operation is much slower than when
> simply doing it on the command-line (42 minutes vs 5 minutes).
> From what I understand most of the time is spent building the f
Hello,
I am facing the same "problem" as mentioned in this thread dating of 2006:
http://ant.1045680.n5.nabble.com/Performance-of-fileset-related-operations-with-a-large-number-of-files-td1361341.html
That is, I'm using ant to build a tar archive of a directory
containing 100,000+ files, and the
