Re: fork, JUnit and Linux

2011-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-09, Knuplesch, Juergen wrote: > when I run a task with > fork="yes" > under LINUX the test does not even start: LINUX is a pretty broad term here. Which version of java are you using? I use Ant on Linux using OpenJDK or Sun's Java without any problems. If this is gcj then you may h

Re: Next Ant Release?

2011-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-09, Perrier, Nathan wrote: > How about merging antcontrib into antcore (I'm sure this has been > discussed, but I'm out of the loop)? This has soo many angles. Let's start with the fact that many of the tasks have been rejectes as parts of Ant's core (conceptually) long ago. I was on

Re: Negative Lookahead and Regexp

2011-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-10, Steve Amerige wrote: > > > > > > your first three properties > prefix="a.b."/> All Ant properties except for those that start with a.b. > > > > All Ant properties including the ones that start with a.b as they are part of the plus set. > If what I'm looking to find

Re: Negative Lookahead and Regexp

2011-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-09, Steve Amerige wrote: > Is negative lookahead supported at all in Ant 1.7 and higher > (Ant-Contrib, too)? Maybe my syntax is off: In general regex suppprt in Ant (not sure about Antcontrib) is provided by a pluggable implementation so the question is whether said implementation su

Re: Macrodef and If

2011-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-09, Steve Amerige wrote: > Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't > have any knowledge of what to do as per my need. I have to trust you on that. > I think, therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as > close as I can get: > > ... > ... >