I played around with it some and got it to compile...I'm not sure if it was
the way the hbm.xml file was referenced or what...it was one of those things
were I kept trying things until it worked. I typically generate most of the
files using XDoclet so I'll have to go back and verify what I didc
Hi,
I'm pretty new to ant am trying to get our ant build to fail when any
junit test fails.
I've looked at our current build.xml and have found the following (which
appears to be correct):
target to run the tests contains:
later target contains:
When I use the Ant -debug option the
Hi Martin. THe blog posting I cited desscribes the symptoms; it also
includes a link to the four files that make up the project. I've now
reproduced the problem on Solaris, too ;-)
Thanks,
Greg
> Hello Gregory
> Perhap you could be more specific about example which causes these race
> condition
Hello Gregory
Perhap you could be more specific about example which causes these race
conditions ?
Martin-
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Ant + Hibernate = Grief + Confusion
> Hi everyo
Hi everyone. So, can there be race conditions in apparently-sequential
Ant build.xml files? The Hibernate folks say this isn't their fault...
http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/000110.html
Thanks,
Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e
Brent Bain wrote:
I've tried the task that Peter Reilly attached to one of the emails about a
month ago for an XPath iterator but I can't seem to get it to work with the
current ant-contrib tasks.
I tested it with the latest ant-contrib - 1.0b1, you may have an older
version in your path.
Also, it
That's probably it. We've had some network changes which have narrowed our bandwith,
which in turn slows the builds. I think they are stepping on each others tails so to
speak.
Thanks
Rob McKenna
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Oc
Thats why we are here
Martin-
- Original Message -
From: "Grand Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: Classpath Issue - Not sure why it isn't being picked up
Thanks to everyone for their help.
Grand
-
Thanks to everyone for their help.
Grand
-Original Message-
From: Laconia Data Systems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:45 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: Classpath Issue - Not sure why it isn't being picked up
Yes
It appears your javac task is exhausti
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's see whether I get yet another "please use a different address"
> mail again.
four hours later, still no such mail - but one for the mail where I
explain why I unsibscribed the address. Looks as if I had picked the
correct one
Stefan Bodewig wrote
Hmm, then either sun.rmi.rmic.RMIGenerator doesn't know it (unlikely)
or you are running sun.rmi.rmic.Main from an older JDK.
Is there jar on your CLASSPATH which contains a class like this?
Candidates are a tools.jar in ANT_HOME/lib and similar strange things.
Stefan
-
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Sune Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [rmic] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> com/sun/corba/se/internal/util/Utility
> [rmic] at
> sun.rmi.rmic.RMIGenerator.sourceFileForClass(RMIGenerator.java:186)
> [rmic] at sun.rmi.rmic.RMIGenerator.(RMI
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:21:35 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 27 septembre 2004 à 11:46 -0700, Jeff Davidson a écrit :
>
> > I know that most of you are packaging Java classes into jar/ear/war
> > files for deployment, but I know I'm not the only one using
> > Crui
Hi
I have a project that works without a problem with Ant and Jdk 1.4.2_05,
but if I try to compile it with Jdk 1.5.0 it failes with the following
error:
ant -v output:
Apache Ant version 1.7alpha compiled on October 6 2004
Buildfile: build.xml
Detected Java version: 1.5 in: /pack/jdk1.5.0/jre
D
turned out to be more involved than I thought.
I've unsubscribed the only .co.za subscriber of this list (@sbic.co.za
actually, which seems to be a domain of Standard Bank) and informed
him/her of the action.
Let's see whether I get yet another "please use a different address"
mail again.
Cheers
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Even if it isn't the right verb, a simple on your source
>> fileset would already do if it knew how to append - as would
>> with a nested . I'd probably prefer the
>> approach since an
16 matches
Mail list logo