I am stuck between a rock and a hard place.
On one hand i would prefer a pay once use for ever license model.
On the other i want a software tool which is maintained and upgraded
regularly, even if that means that i have to pay for it.
I remember discussions when the old “pay once use that vers
From a purely selfish point of view (what, me, surely not?) I stated I
wanted to PAY for something
PERMANENT because I develop ONLY for desktop (and possibly HTML%)
deployment.
This is where we might need to discuss the sort of folowing scenario:
1. Permanent version that deploys standalones o
On 02/05/2016 22:57, Alain Vezina wrote:
Hi all,
On Android 5.1.1 and 6 the revBrowser and DataBase librairies don’t work with
LC 7.1.3. I use SQLite
Anybody else had the same experience?
Should I send a bug report?
Yes please!
Peter
--
Dr Peter Brett
LiveCod
We paid for the code and we were given
a link to download the code to be used as
open source code. We did not make any
agreement to fund its development.
JB
> On May 2, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> Aha... Was the Kickstarter for open source or for the refactor? When you
> con
> On 3 May 2016, at 10:07 PM, JB wrote:
>
> We paid for the code and we were given
> a link to download the code to be used as
> open source code. We did not make any
> agreement to fund its development.
My point was different people may have contributed to the Kickstarter for
different reaso
You are correct!
I helped fund the open source and never
made any complaints about it and am not
complaining now.
JB
> On May 3, 2016, at 5:13 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
>
>> On 3 May 2016, at 10:07 PM, JB wrote:
>>
>> We paid for the code and we were given
>> a link to download the code
When I did my IP subnet calculator, there were some things that required
binary, like determining what part of the IP address was the network address,
and other operations required decimal. Of course, that was a unique problem as
each octet is a discreet value, and not part of a *total* address.
On May 2, 2016, at 05:56 , Paul Dupuis
mailto:p...@researchware.com>> wrote:
For every organization delivering a product, that organization has to
make the product's cost vs value work for THEM. If they charge too
little, they go out of business. If they charge too much, no one buys
it.
This ass
With a little extra work you could make that work from any base to any base.
Bob S
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 08:18 , RM wrote:
>
> That's me, the ultimate Hex-object of 2016.
>
> However, as it is that time of the month I'm not really feeling Hexxy at all,
> so I wrote a little something for tho
I'd like to remind everyone that there is another aspect to developing in
livecode which probably keeps us all engaged, beyond the profit potential: It's
damned fun! I doubt I will ever be able to produce a commercially marketable
application, and yet I have writted a number of useful aplication
Richmond.
LC cannot add "20F" to "4CD". You need to use "baseConvert". Not onerous at
all, really.
Craig
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Doing-Maths-in-Hex-tp4704028p4704160.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> On May 3, 2016, at 9:32 AM, dunbarx wrote:
>
> Richmond.
>
> LC cannot add "20F" to "4CD". You need to use "baseConvert". Not onerous at
> all, really.
put baseConvert(baseConvert("20F",16,10) + baseConvert("4CD",16,10),10,16)
devin
Devin Asay
Office of Digital Humanities
Brigham Young Un
As a paying customer, I can confirm, that we do receive surveys. It might
be three or four per year, and the questions might not always be the ones I
wish were being asked, but we are being queried.
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Bob Sneidar
wrote:
> I'd like to remind everyone that there is
and with a bit of factoring...
put addHex( "20F", "4CD")
function addHex v1, v2
local d1, d2
put baseConvert( v1,16,10) into d1
put baseConvert( v2,16,10) into d2
return baseconvert( d1 + d2, 10, 16)
end addHex
Thierry
2016-05-03 18:13 GMT+02:00 Devin Asay :
>
> > On May 3,
> On May 3, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Thierry Douez wrote:
>
> and with a bit of factoring...
>
> put addHex( "20F", "4CD")
>
>
> function addHex v1, v2
> local d1, d2
> put baseConvert( v1,16,10) into d1
> put baseConvert( v2,16,10) into d2
> return baseconvert( d1 + d2, 10, 16)
> end a
> > and with a bit of factoring...
> >
> > put addHex( "20F", "4CD")
> >
> >
> > function addHex v1, v2
> > local d1, d2
> > put baseConvert( v1,16,10) into d1
> > put baseConvert( v2,16,10) into d2
> > return baseconvert( d1 + d2, 10, 16)
> > end addHex
> >
> > Thierry
>
> Well done, T
I’m looking forward to a small coloring/drawing module for our big app. Little
hacking today:
Today I tried clicking on the pen tool and drawing.. It auto created an object
that takes up the entire card and not just where I drew. So I created an image
object first, then tried the tools. Pen to
Quite honestly I don't think they have been touched for donkey's ages,
and they are not much use as they are at present.
Richmond.
On 3.05.2016 20:51, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
I’m looking forward to a small coloring/drawing module for our big app. Little
hacking today:
Today I tried
Do you want drawing tools or painting tools?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com
Bonjour Thierry,
Perfect.
But now, of course, the question arises, how to do that in base 42 ;-)
Hermann
Thierry Douez wrote
> .. and before the next question will arise:
>
>
> put addHexy( "20F", "4CD", "10", "3AB")
>
> function addHexy
>local T
>repeat with i = 1 to paramCount()
>
> On May 3, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
> wrote:
>
> I’m looking forward to a small coloring/drawing module for our big app.
> Little hacking today:
>
> Today I tried clicking on the pen tool and drawing.. It auto created an
> object that takes up the entire card and not j
Greetings!
I am having a problem tracking down a bug. But the real problem is that the
LC's error dialog is showing empty. I put this in my stack script:
on errorDialog pExecutionError, pParseError
answer pExecutionError &cr& pParseError
end errorDialog
It does fire, but both pExecutionErro
To be precise:
LiveCode 2.7.x or later (any edition should do)
Visual C++ 2005 – any edition including Express (if you want to build
externals on Windows)
XCode 2.4.x (if want to build externals on Mac OS X)
(At least it exists now - when I last posted to this list in despair
(09/10/2015 18:4
Dan,
There is a good chance that the problem is in the IDE. Put true into
gRevDevelopment, turn on the Script Debug Mode (Development menu) and
try again. Does the debug window appear and where does the execution halt?
Kind regards,
Mark Schonewille
http://economy-x-talk.com
https://www.face
Mark,
I just tried your suggestion and I got the same empty "Errors" dialog, and the
execution did not halt at all, same as before.
What does this mean?
-Dan
> Dan,
>
> There is a good chance that the problem is in the IDE. Put true into
> gRevDevelopment, turn on the Script Debug Mode (De
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
> ...is there anyway an explanation of the differences and
> relationships between:
>
> - widgets
Custom controls written in LiveCode Builder with advanced
rendering and packaging.
> - libraries
Can be written in either LiveCode Script or LiveCode Builder.
N
I do the exact same thing Peter. I learned this when I was developing for a
dBase accounting application. All their control structures and terminations
were commented quite extensively, and I was able to learn dBase and their code
specifically because they did.
Bob S
On Apr 30, 2016, at 06:31
Don't do that. You'll break the universe.
Bob S
On May 3, 2016, at 11:53 , [-hh]
mailto:h...@hh.on-rev.com>> wrote:
Bonjour Thierry,
Perfect.
But now, of course, the question arises, how to do that in base 42 ;-)
Hermann
___
use-livecode mailing l
On 05/03/2016 11:53 AM, [-hh] wrote:
Bonjour Thierry,
Perfect.
But now, of course, the question arises, how to do that in base 42 ;-)
return (6 * 8)
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
P
On 5/3/16, 11:01 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of Devin Asay"
wrote:
>I have the same question as Richard—are you talking about drawing (graphics)
>tools or painting (image) tools? I think you’re referring to paint tools. In
>that case I can confirm—the brush, spray can, and eraser tools seem
I goes one of the central issue of a community version.. is.. community!?
How to make people feel member of the community? get them involved?
One way of doing that is to let people buy something maybe not much, but
something. That was the idea of the pay once upgrade when you feel which was
tried
I think the community version would have
more community involvement if they gave
people more externals to show them how
to create externals.
I get the feeling tje mothership does not
want community advancement externals.
And so it is obvious everyone cannot be
involved in programming the open sou
The fact that is so much discussion about the licenses shows there is a
problem. LiveCode's pricing has been complex as long as I can remember.
Most software you pay once, it's yours, you get free updates, and if there
is a major upgrade, you pay for upgrade. Big, terrible companies like Adobe
are
> On 4 May 2016, at 2:20 PM, JB wrote:
> And so it is obvious everyone cannot be
> involved in programming the open source
> version for many different reasons. That
> leaves people little chance to participate
> by adding code. Use it, point out bugs
> and pay money. That is not what I was
>
Monte
I think that you have missed out one way to contribute that would be very
valuable to both the community and LiveCode. That is writing automatically
runnable tests. There is an automated test suite but it is kept under lock and
key by LiveCode so that community members cannot contribute b
> On 4 May 2016, at 3:12 PM, Peter W A Wood wrote:
>
> I think that you have missed out one way to contribute that would be very
> valuable to both the community and LiveCode. That is writing automatically
> runnable tests.
I did miss that!
> There is an automated test suite but it is kept u
Monte
> On 4 May 2016, at 13:20, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
>
>> On 4 May 2016, at 3:12 PM, Peter W A Wood wrote:
>>
>> I think that you have missed out one way to contribute that would be very
>> valuable to both the community and LiveCode. That is writing automatically
>> runnable tests.
>
It seems to me as a “community” user that there is no community.
There only appears to be those that want to pay, those that can’t afford to pay
and those that don’t want to pay for ideological reasons.
I, personally do not feel part of a community.
When I read the discussions (not just this th
38 matches
Mail list logo
