On 04/13/2013 07:48 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and
not using LiveCode.
Very droll.
From a personal point of view I don't mind logging in and sending
whatever info to RunRev as
they know all about my "warts" already :)
Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and
not using LiveCode.
On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Richmond wrote:
>>> That fixed things, LiveCode installed from the downloads folder just fine.
>>> I did do the register stage, given there was no choice, and it seem
On 04/13/2013 01:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Colin Holgate wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get i
On 04/13/2013 12:12 AM, Roger Eller wrote:
A 64-bit version was listed in the kickstarter stretch goals. Maybe that
was in the back of your mind when you downloaded it.
But stretch is as stretch does, and looking at RunRev's list of goals
they will be, indeed, stretched
to provide a 64 bit b
Colin-
Friday, April 12, 2013, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
> Please do comment on the right tools to do C++ coding on Linux,
> and contributing to the community version of LiveCode.
May I direct your attention to:
http://forums.runrev.com/viewforum.php?f=66
I'm currently using gcc 4.7.2 on my 64-bit
Please do comment on the right tools to do C++ coding on Linux, and
contributing to the community version of LiveCode.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Yeah, I just got home and I'm trigger-happy with the responses.
___
use-livecode
Colin-
Friday, April 12, 2013, 5:33:06 PM, you wrote:
> You so need to read previous messages! That was the very first thing I tried.
Yeah, I just got home and I'm trigger-happy with the responses.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-li
You so need to read previous messages! That was the very first thing I tried.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>> How do you launch applications on Linux?
>
> You need to set the executable bit.
> Right-click on it
> Go to Properties
> Select the Permissions tab
> Check "Execute
Colin Holgate writes:
> How do you launch applications on Linux?
You need to set the executable bit.
Right-click on it
Go to Properties
Select the Permissions tab
Check "Execute": Allow executing file as program
Close
Double-click
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
Warren Samples writes:
> Colin it seems you have installed 64 bit Linux but LiveCode needs 32
> bit. You can install the ia32 bit libs or a pure 32 bit version of your
> distro.
OTOH, 64-bit linux mint comes with the 32-bit libraries already installed by
default, so nothing more than setting t
On 4/12/13 6:17 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 13/04/2013, at 7:58 AM, "J. Landman Gay"
wrote:
Oh that again.
Mark Wieder is working on compiling for 64 bit on Linux. Looks like
he's working on the IDE engine but I imagine if he gets that then
server will come quickly...
I noticed that and
Richmond writes:
> Changing the installer's suffix to .exe is daft as it is NOT a Window's
> executable but a Linux one,
> and if you have WINE installed all sorts of merry things may then ensue.
Yes, this is not a good idea even if it works, and there's no reason for it
to do anything useful.
On 13/04/2013, at 7:58 AM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> Oh that again.
Mark Wieder is working on compiling for 64 bit on Linux. Looks like he's
working on the IDE engine but I imagine if he gets that then server will come
quickly...
Cheers
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software developm
Colin Holgate wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs
That fixed things, LiveCode in
On 4/12/13 3:02 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Colin, just a wild idea, try installing ia32-libs.
Oh that again.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use
A 64-bit version was listed in the kickstarter stretch goals. Maybe that
was in the back of your mind when you downloaded it.
~Roger
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
> automatically gave me the one I
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs
That fixed things, LiveCode installed from the downlo
Colin, just a wild idea, try installing ia32-libs.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/setting-up-Linux-for-LiveCode-and-other-dev-questions-tp4663254p4663287.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
permissions, and make it executable. Then
> double-click and install.
>
> ~Roger
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/setting-up-Linux-for-LiveCode-and-other-dev-questions-tp4663254p4663285.html
Sent from the Revolution - User m
On 04/12/2013 02:41 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I had already set the permissions to be read write for everyone, moved it out
of the downloads folder, and set the executable box. None of those helped.
Here's one clue, if I do this:
ldd LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86
I get:
not a dyn
I had already set the permissions to be read write for everyone, moved it out
of the downloads folder, and set the executable box. None of those helped.
Here's one clue, if I do this:
ldd LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86
I get:
not a dynamic executable
If I then try:
readelf -l Liv
On 04/12/2013 09:16 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
Which Linux? In Ubuntu, I always move it out of the downloads folder, then
right-click it, go to permissions, and make it executable. Then
double-click and install.
UbuntuStudio 13.04
~Roger
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Which Linux? In Ubuntu, I always move it out of the downloads folder, then
right-click it, go to permissions, and make it executable. Then
double-click and install.
~Roger
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe instead of .x86, and
On 04/12/2013 08:56 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe instead of .x86, and then when I
double clicked on it it revealed a set of files and folders. One of those is an
installer folder, but that only contains a png.
Still looking for help on how to run the ins
I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe instead of .x86, and then when I
double clicked on it it revealed a set of files and folders. One of those is an
installer folder, but that only contains a png.
Still looking for help on how to run the installer on Linux!
_
I have been licensed for both programs, and have had spells where I used
Fusion. A while ago though Parallels overtook Fusion again, in particular to do
with hardware 3D, and so Parallels is better for the time being.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Richmond wrote:
>
> >I use VMware and love i
The download and install of Ubuntu went really well. I downloaded the community
edition of LiveCode, a file named LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86.
That wanted me to select the application to use for opening it. I went into its
properties and checked the box that said "allow to execute
On 04/12/2013 04:22 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I already have Windows 8 running under Parallels, and it works extremely well.
I did try Virtual Box a while ago, but had some issues with it. It would just
be similar to add a new VM to Parallels.
I use VMware and love it.
Richmond.
On Apr 12
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the suggestions. In the end though I'm downloading Ubuntu. Not so
much because it's the one I've heard people rave about the most, but because
there's huge "download Ubuntu" button inside Parallels! I figure that's going
to be easier than going with another variety.
Do you
ere we end up.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/setting-up-Linux-for-LiveCode-and-other-dev-questions-tp4663254p4663264.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode
I already have Windows 8 running under Parallels, and it works extremely well.
I did try Virtual Box a while ago, but had some issues with it. It would just
be similar to add a new VM to Parallels.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Pierre Sahores wrote:
>
> >About the VM part of your question, i
Colin,
About the VM part of your question, i use Virtual Box (FOSS version) and
prefers it to Parallels i used before. About the Linux part of your question,
Richard may give you a more actualized response than i my do ;-)
Best,
Le 12 avr. 2013 à 15:02, Colin Holgate a écrit :
> Are any of yo
Are any of you running Linux under Parallels? I need to write about the process
of pull the source code and building LiveCode, for Mac and Windows anyway, and
I may as well show what's involved in Linux.
Which Linux would be best for LiveCode, and for building LiveCode? Which
development softwa
33 matches
Mail list logo
