Re: sent message skipping card handler and going to stack

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote: > If your closeField handler is at stack level, then it will be able to call > other handlers at stack level or higher only. If you want to call a handler > lower in the message hierarchy, then you need to use the send command: send > "up

Re: sent message skipping card handler and going to stack

On 8/11/12 4:05 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: I'm probably missing something simple here . . . A field does a bit on closeField, and then passes closeField. In the stack closeField, updMyVal is invoked. Rather than the card handler for updMyVal, it steps into the stack handler for updMyVal. What cou

Re: sent message skipping card handler and going to stack

Hi, If your closeField handler is at stack level, then it will be able to call other handlers at stack level or higher only. If you want to call a handler lower in the message hierarchy, then you need to use the send command: send "updMyVal" to this cd. If this doesn't answer your question, th

sent message skipping card handler and going to stack

I'm probably missing something simple here . . . A field does a bit on closeField, and then passes closeField. In the stack closeField, updMyVal is invoked. Rather than the card handler for updMyVal, it steps into the stack handler for updMyVal. What could be causing this? -- The Hawkins Law