They finally got to the watched global crashes to desktop bug! They are making
progress.
Bob
On Mar 23, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2013, at 4:41 AM, Andrew Meit wrote:
>
>> I do hope with the huge donations, QA for LC gets what it needs -- now.
>> Really!
>
> An
Cool, thanks for letting me know. :-)
On Mar 23, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Goulding wrote:
> Andrew have you been to RunRev QA lately. It's VERY responsive. RunRev have
> really turned this area around in the last year. Sure there's issues that
> need to be touched from when this wasn't so good but I t
On 24/03/2013, at 4:41 AM, Andrew Meit wrote:
> I do hope with the huge donations, QA for LC gets what it needs -- now.
> Really!
Andrew have you been to RunRev QA lately. It's VERY responsive. RunRev have
really turned this area around in the last year. Sure there's issues that need
to be t
On 3/23/13 7:13 PM, "Lynn Fredricks" wrote:
>> I think it's common policy for software companies to not
>> openly discuss bugs. Once a bug is confirmed and widespread,
>> of course they have to acknowledge it, but I do not know of
>> any company that openly publishes known bugs except for maybe
>
Richmond-
Saturday, March 23, 2013, 12:59:42 AM, you wrote:
> Oh, quite; one thing that I feel one should expect from a company that
> is producing an open Source product is Openness; and I do think that
> RunRev are a bit on the quiet side when it comes to talking
> about some of those long-term
I rather deal with a software company who is open and direct about their bugs
and bug database. For me, feature set is just one reason to get the software,
the other is timeliness and thoroughness on handling reported bugs stated
publicly and certainly privately too! The classic 'trade secret' a
> I think it's common policy for software companies to not
> openly discuss bugs. Once a bug is confirmed and widespread,
> of course they have to acknowledge it, but I do not know of
> any company that openly publishes known bugs except for maybe
> Blizzard.
Game companies are a bit differen
I think it's common policy for software companies to not openly discuss bugs.
Once a bug is confirmed and widespread, of course they have to acknowledge it,
but I do not know of any company that openly publishes known bugs except for
maybe Blizzard.
Bob
On Mar 23, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Richmond
On 03/23/2013 05:59 AM, Cal Horner wrote:
I know that what I just finished reading in Rev-Up is not the case. That the
sub-headline text:
"Our whole team is focused on just one goal at the moment - LiveCode Open
Source".
Can't really be what is going on there at RunRev.
This must be some adverti
Cal-
Friday, March 22, 2013, 8:59:54 PM, you wrote:
> I know that what I just finished reading in Rev-Up is not the case. That the
> sub-headline text:
> "Our whole team is focused on just one goal at the moment - LiveCode Open
> Source".
> Can't really be what is going on there at RunRev.
> Thi
I know that what I just finished reading in Rev-Up is not the case. That the
sub-headline text:
"Our whole team is focused on just one goal at the moment - LiveCode Open
Source".
Can't really be what is going on there at RunRev.
This must be some advertising hype to make us all "Feel" good. And it
11 matches
Mail list logo