On 2/21/11 7:05 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I guess the only upside here is that so far it appears as though "it" is
indeed reliable as long as you use "create", and workarounds are only
needed in some cases where you create objects by other means.
I stand corrected, at least in part: while look
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 2/20/11 10:37 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
dunbarx wrote:
> It is not stable. Scott is correct in that we all agreed that the
> only reliable workaround was to use the templateGroup to advantage.
Sorry, but I missed that meeting: under what circumstances does the
local
On 2/21/11 2:47 AM, Terry Judd wrote:
On 21/02/11 5:24 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
When you aren't using "create", the "it" variable has no value:
select control 1 and control 2
group
put it
Produces nothing.
But in that case you could use the selectedObject.
--
Jacqueline
On 21/02/11 5:24 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> When you aren't using "create", the "it" variable has no value:
>
>select control 1 and control 2
>group
>put it
>
> Produces nothing.
But in that case you could use the selectedObject.
Terry...
--
Dr Terry Judd | Senior Lecturer in
dghorizontals' within the datagrid, not
the one created by the group command. I don't know its layer because it is
somehow hidden from the Application Browser.
As Jacqueline mentioned, the "it" variable doesn't help here since I'm not
using the create command. I have w
On 2/20/11 10:37 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
dunbarx wrote:
> It is not stable. Scott is correct in that we all agreed that the
> only reliable workaround was to use the templateGroup to advantage.
Sorry, but I missed that meeting: under what circumstances does the
local var "it" not contain th
dunbarx wrote:
> It is not stable. Scott is correct in that we all agreed that the
> only reliable workaround was to use the templateGroup to advantage.
Sorry, but I missed that meeting: under what circumstances does the
local var "it" not contain the long id of the newly-created group object
: Sun, Feb 20, 2011 9:56 pm
Subject: Re: The group command
Peter Haworth wrote:
> The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group
> command by using the last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone
> used this successfully?
As the others here have no
Peter Haworth wrote:
> The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group
> command by using the last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone
> used this successfully?
As the others here have noted, it's possible to create a group such that
it won't
Recently, Peter Haworth wrote:
> The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group command by
> using the last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone used this successfully?
> For me, it is returning information about a group with a lower ID than the one
>
On Feb 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group
command by using the last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone
used this successfully? For me, it is returning information about a
group with a lower ID th
x27;s what I would expect.
Phil
On 2/20/11 4:18 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group command by using the
last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone used this successfully? For me,
it is returning information about a group
The dictionary says I can refer to the group created by the group command by
using the last keyword as in "last group". Has anyone used this successfully?
For me, it is returning information about a group with a lower ID than the one
created by the group command.
Pe
13 matches
Mail list logo
