Richmond-
Sunday, January 23, 2011, 9:14:17 AM, you wrote:
> With the advent of a new generation of micro-computer (phones, mp4
> players, and so on),
> that virtue may not be seen as quite as redundant as people have been
> thinking recently.
You and I are old enough to remember when squeezing
On 01/23/2011 07:09 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Not just your wife :)
On 23 January 2011 16:32, Roger Guay wrote:
As to size, I felt that the bigger problem for something like this was to
keep the byte size down, what with all of the images needed for it. Hence,
the images were kept to a minimum
Not just your wife :)
On 23 January 2011 16:32, Roger Guay wrote:
>
> As to size, I felt that the bigger problem for something like this was to
> keep the byte size down, what with all of the images needed for it. Hence,
> the images were kept to a minimum size, which led to the size of the
> Ti
Thanks for your feedback, David (and Klaus). I'm certain that you could pull it
apart and add to it, but I thought it might be fun to add the ability for users
to add events to it without pulling it apart. I'll certainly give that some
thought. And a "play" function sounds interesting too. Hmmm.
