On 01/23/2011 07:09 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Not just your wife :)
On 23 January 2011 16:32, Roger Guay<[email protected]> wrote:
As to size, I felt that the bigger problem for something like this was to
keep the byte size down, what with all of the images needed for it. Hence,
the images were kept to a minimum size, which led to the size of the
TimeScope etc. My wife, wants me to convert this to an iPad app, but I
haven't gotten very far with that whole arena . . . yet.
Wives, byte sizes, conversion . . . almost as inflammatory words as
'cheese' . . . :)
I do feel that, with the advent of computers with bucketloads of RAM and
socking-great hard disks the virtue of trying to keep ones files small has
got lost.
With the advent of a new generation of micro-computer (phones, mp4
players, and so on),
that virtue may not be seen as quite as redundant as people have been
thinking recently.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
