On Tuesday, August 21, 2012, william humphrey wrote:
> Try Valentina if speed is an issue as it is much faster.
Its not the database speed that's at issue here; the are small databases
and pretty much instant. It's the lag from the remote database that I'm
dealing with her.
--
The Hawkins L
Try Valentina if speed is an issue as it is much faster.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Monday, August 20, 2012, william humphrey wrote:
>
> > What remote database are you using?
> >
>
> I'm planning on it being Postgres, but I want to stay compatible with
> MySQL, too
On Monday, August 20, 2012, william humphrey wrote:
> What remote database are you using?
>
I'm planning on it being Postgres, but I want to stay compatible with
MySQL, too
I'm assumeing that I'd buffer into mysql
--
The Hawkins Law Firm
Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
hawkinslawf...@
What I'm doing is, on closeField, an SQL command is created and added to a
queue, which is stored in a custom property, as well as calling a handler that
starts processing the queue.
Since this is fairly instant there is no lag in tabbing through fields or any
user interface operation.
The que
What remote database are you using?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> Aside from the "minor" issues of database creation and the web buffer
> layer, I have my application talking to a remote server.
>
> The lag, though, is quite noticeable, when tabbing from one field that
>
