On Feb 4, 2015, at 6:48 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> Can you give us some estimates (or actual numbers) for:
>> - Number of objects
>>
>
> Lots.
>
> Lots and lots and lots.
>
> :)
>
> I don't even know how to guess.
>
> Looks like generally 60-200 per page on the main entry stack of 12 cards,
>
Ya once I heard about the splashStack method and all the problems it solves,
it’s the only way I will build an app now.
Bob S
On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:25 , J. Landman Gay
mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>> wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:54 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:00 PM, J. Landman
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> The project I've been on lately has hundreds of stacks and thousands
> of support files with gigabytes of data, they're just not all in
> the main app. It's easier that way. The app itself takes under 15
> seconds to compile.
That's a good strategy for many reasons, but I
On 2/4/2015 11:54 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:00 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
I've never built an app that large, for something like that I usually use
the splash method so that I can have modules.
Oh, and you're not selling to lawyers :)
True, but I'm not sure that affec
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:00 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> I've never built an app that large, for something like that I usually use
> the splash method so that I can have modules.
>
Oh, and you're not selling to lawyers :)
Once the program is established, changes will actually happen more in the
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:00 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> I'm still thinking the slowdown is due to having "search for required
> inclusions" selected in the standalone settings. The search would have to
> scan and parse at least 30,000+ lines just given the specs that were
> listed. Richard (the H
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 2/4/2015 6:12 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> That doesn't seem big enough to need 15 minutes to scan the objects.
>>
>> Anyone else seen anything like this?
>
> I've never built an app that large, for something like that I usually
> use the splash method so that I can ha
On 2/4/2015 6:12 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
That doesn't seem big enough to need 15 minutes to scan the objects.
Anyone else seen anything like this?
I've never built an app that large, for something like that I usually
use the splash method so that I can have modules.
I'm still thinking th
I have a project where there was a main stack with some subs stacks, and the
whole size was 100 MB. Probably 4000 cards + 200 images.
It was taken maybe 15+ minutes to build.
I took out the large sub stacks and keep them separate in a data folder. Now it
takes seconds to build a launcher stack t
That doesn't seem big enough to need 15 minutes to scan the objects.
Anyone else seen anything like this?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
ambassa.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> > I just saw livecode take 15 minutes building a standalone (quadcore
> > i5,16gb)...
>
> That's a very long time.
>
> indeed :)
I think it was something like 3-5 min with 5.5, but it probably wasn't even
that long
Can you give us some e
Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I just saw livecode take 15 minutes building a standalone (quadcore
> i5,16gb)...
That's a very long time.
Can you give us some estimates (or actual numbers) for:
- Number of objects
- Number of lines of code
- Total stack file size
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Do you have "search for inclusions" in standalone settings set? If so, it has
to read every script and look at every object. It's the default.
Choose the option to specify inclusions manually.
On February 3, 2015 9:25:56 PM CST, "Dr. Hawkins" wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dr. Hawki
I have created a distribution standalone under 7.0.2 RC 2 and besides it not
creating a 64 bit binary experienced no other issues. Seemed just as fast as
normal.
Cheers, Jeff
> On 4 Feb 2015, at 2:25 pm, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Asid
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> Aside from the fact that that should be findable, should this take this
> long?
OK, 15 minutes seems to be how long it takes *without* errors, too.
I feel like I fell into the 1980s . . .
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
