Ya once I heard about the splashStack method and all the problems it solves, 
it’s the only way I will build an app now.

Bob S


On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:25 , J. Landman Gay 
<jac...@hyperactivesw.com<mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>> wrote:

On 2/4/2015 11:54 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:00 PM, J. Landman Gay 
<jac...@hyperactivesw.com<mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>>
wrote:

I've never built an app that large, for something like that I usually use
the splash method so that I can have modules.


Oh, and you're not selling to lawyers :)

True, but I'm not sure that affects compile times...

I didn't actully mean I never had a project that large, only that I never had 
an app that large (and I wouldn't build one.) The project I've been on lately 
has hundreds of stacks and thousands of support files with gigabytes of data, 
they're just not all in the main app. It's easier that way. The app itself 
takes under 15 seconds to compile. The heavy-duty working part has maybe 3500 
lines of backscript, four behavior scripts, three substacks, and maybe 100 
small images. Everything else -- the actual content -- is distributed among 
separate module stacks that each contain the images, media, text, etc. that are 
relevant to that stack. But I don't have to compile those.

Using a single main app to run the whole shebang makes revisions very easy, we 
just upload new content stacks to the server and the main app pulls them down 
as needed.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     
jac...@hyperactivesw.com<mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>
HyperActive Software           |     
http://www.hyperactivesw.com<http://www.hyperactivesw.com/>

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to