Richmond wrote:
Nothing is intrinsically wrong with RevNet, it is just very out-of-date.
Agreed. It could use some pruning of the stacks it has access to, and a
freshened appearance.
Those and more are on my to-do list, but client work pays for that so I
must continue to give priority to s
On 06/21/2012 05:55 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
> I would characterise RunRev as a company that produces a super
> product, but is signally bad at follow-up with bug reports and
> maintenance of components (such as Rev-Online and RevNet)...
To clarify, RevNet is not a product of R
Alex Tweedly wrote:
On 20/06/2012 01:23, Richard Gaskin wrote:
In LiveCode, see Development->Plugins->GoRevNet, and once there see
the Stacks section.
RevNet was the first community-based stack sharing service, later
somewhat displaced by the advent of RevOnline two years later.
It all still
Alex Tweedly wrote:
On 20/06/2012 15:49, Richard Gaskin wrote:
On-Rev is still in business as a shared hosting alternative with
RevServer preinstalled, and RevServer itself is kinda nifty and also
remains available, currently at v5.0.1 (understandable that it's not
using 5.5 since most of the a
I've never tried uploading to RevOnline before, mainly because I didn't have
anything worthwhile to contribute. After reading so many reports that it was
broken I decided to see if I could log on and see where the issues are, then at
least I would know what people were talking about.
I couldn't
Not what I meant - it's easy to "miss" reports in a feedback system. I was
asking if you've contacted one of the staff directly. Much harder to miss such
a request.
Tim
On Jun 20, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Yes, but even if they had not, they posted to the quality center which is
Richmond wrote:
> I would characterise RunRev as a company that produces a super
> product, but is signally bad at follow-up with bug reports and
> maintenance of components (such as Rev-Online and RevNet)...
To clarify, RevNet is not a product of RunRev Ltd., but was created and
is maintained
On 21/06/12 10:20, Rolf Kocherhans wrote:
Hello Tim
Yes !
We probably all have !
My last try was yesterday !
This is the response I got one months ago:
Ticket#201205091326
Hello Rolf,
Hopefully I will be tackling this issue with revOnline soon, but unfortunately I
c
Hello Tim
Yes !
We probably all have !
My last try was yesterday !
This is the response I got one months ago:
Ticket#201205091326
Hello Rolf,
Hopefully I will be tackling this issue with revOnline soon, but unfortunately
I
can't give you any estimate or assurances a
Le 20 juin 2012 à 21:38, Mark Wieder a écrit :
> The issue isn't whether you or any other third party can come up with
> an alternative... it looks bad for the official company-sponsored way
> to share content and show off what can be done with their flagship
> product to be broken for over six m
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> I just looked, and my earliest still-waiting-to-be-confirmed bug
> report is from early 2004.
>
I got bit in 1999 by a bug in MS word on windows that existed in 1.0 Mac
(almost blank page when footnote miscalculated). It's still there, for all
I
Andre-
Tuesday, June 19, 2012, 11:01:09 PM, you wrote:
> Weeks??? I have pet bugs that have been sitting there for YEARS
I just looked, and my earliest still-waiting-to-be-confirmed bug
report is from early 2004.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
On 20/06/2012 15:49, Richard Gaskin wrote:
On-Rev is still in business as a shared hosting alternative with
RevServer preinstalled, and RevServer itself is kinda nifty and also
remains available, currently at v5.0.1 (understandable that it's not
using 5.5 since most of the additions are for the
On 20/06/2012 01:23, Richard Gaskin wrote:
In LiveCode, see Development->Plugins->GoRevNet, and once there see
the Stacks section.
RevNet was the first community-based stack sharing service, later
somewhat displaced by the advent of RevOnline two years later.
It all still works, and I would
Andre Garzia writes:
> I completely agree with you and I too have my own bag of corporate insane
> bugs here. I know we should have them working on it but if I could provide
> an alternative uploader for the interval between today and they fixing
> things, I think it would be good.
I don't mean
Yes, but even if they had not, they posted to the quality center which is
actually where they are supposed to. They are saying that no response has come
to those posts. It would be better if someone came back and said, "We really do
not have time at present to address this issue." or else, "We p
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Andre-
>
> Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 5:57:26 AM, you wrote:
>
> > calls and one for calls that send password. Given time, I think I may be
> > able to build a alternative uploader.
>
> The issue isn't whether you or any other third party can c
I don't mean to play "Obvious Man" here, but has anyone actually contacted
Heather, et al and asked for it to be fixed?
Tim
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Richard-
>
> You are, I think, missing the point. The issue is more about
> announcing a new initiative, getting users
Richard-
You are, I think, missing the point. The issue is more about
announcing a new initiative, getting users started down that path, and
then abandoning things.
When was the last time the broken on-rev client got updated? I can't
imagine anyone on the team taking the time to revisit this. Nor
Andre-
Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 5:57:26 AM, you wrote:
> calls and one for calls that send password. Given time, I think I may be
> able to build a alternative uploader.
The issue isn't whether you or any other third party can come up with
an alternative... it looks bad for the official company
Richard-
Well, I'm not disagreeing with anything you said there. I just don't
see any third-party options having the traction needed to make this
work. Look at the usage differences between the runrev web forum and
the LiveJournal web forum, for instance. It's not a matter of what
content is there
Le 20 juin 2012 à 17:07, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
> Similarly, community-oriented tools like RevOnline could conceivably become
> community-driven. Portions of the IDE as well.
YES !
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Pleas
Mark Wieder wrote:
...
> it would look really bad for the company to have this added as Yet
> Another Failed Runrev Initiative.
I'm not clear what you mean, Mark: would it look bad to provide a
community-based solution for sharing stack files?
I like to imagine a future in which RunRev consid
Richmond wrote:
> Mark Wieder wrote:
>> (notice that I succeeded in not mentioning web deployment, on-rev,
>> RevMedia, DreamCard, etc by name)
>
> That list does seem a bit long.
Not so much when you look at the details:
RevMedia and DreamCard were just different names for the same
experiment
Mark Wieder wrote:
Also, on a completely different level, the process of finding
workarounds on this list is a bonding experience that builds the
online community as we work together to hone our skills. I'm
constantly amazed by the brilliant snippets of code that folks here
come up with.
Beaut
Andre Garzia wrote:
I've uploaded a stack this month... it worked as expected. RevOnline
protocol is pretty simple, they just send a base64 encoded compressed
arrayencoded array back and forth.
GMTA :) That's become my favorite packaging method for moving stuff
between standalones and servers
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Igor de Oliveira Couto <
i...@superstudent.net> wrote:
> On 20/06/2012, at 5:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> > Hmmm. Well, my password has always worked fine. I have no trouble
> > logging in to revOnline. I just can't upload anything. Glad it worked
> > for you.
>
>
On 20/06/2012, at 5:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Hmmm. Well, my password has always worked fine. I have no trouble
> logging in to revOnline. I just can't upload anything. Glad it worked
> for you.
Aaaah, 'must admit, haven't tried *that* yet...
--
Igor Couto
Sydney, Australia
_
Igor-
Tuesday, June 19, 2012, 10:33:51 PM, you wrote:
> I can report, that I got RevOnline to work. I clicked on the
> 'forgot password?' link, and tried getting through to the next step.
> Usually, it tries contacting the Rev server, and nothing happens, so
> I just force-quit it. This time, how
Richmond-
Tuesday, June 19, 2012, 11:17:43 PM, you wrote:
> One of my least favourite words on this user-list is "Work-around", and
Well, that point I may take issue with. If there's a problem with the
engine or IDE or somesuch and there does exist a workaround, then I'm
less frantic about the b
On 06/20/2012 09:01 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
I have several QCC reports that have been sitting in silence for several
weeks
Weeks??? I have pet bugs that have been sitting there for YEARS
For example:
* Can't take snapshot of second
On 06/20/2012 04:02 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Alex, Richard-
Yes, but... three things:
it wouldn't have the authority of the company behind it, in the way
that the Apple store, etc does
I don't recall a link from the runrev site to LiveCode Journal, or
it's somewhere out of the way.
it would loo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> I have several QCC reports that have been sitting in silence for several
> weeks
>
Weeks??? I have pet bugs that have been sitting there for YEARS
For example:
* Can't take snapshot of second monitor (entered in 2006)
* Can't take sna
On 06/20/2012 03:01 AM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
RevOnline has been effectively broken for a long time. Long enough
that we should be able to predict that it won't be fixed any time soon.
And I think that's probably a good resource allocation decision for
runrev.
revonline is basically a websit
Dear List Folks,
On 20/06/2012, at 6:04 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Mark Rauterkus writes:
>
>> With Rev Online, can I delete some of my stacks already uploaded? I
>> put some junk there in the past that should be deleted.
>
> RevOnline's functionality has been dead for over six months now. To br
Hi Mark,
I'd have more sympathy for all that if the many QCC reports on the issue
had received a response of some sort, even if it was "Sorry guys, we know
it's broken but it's not a high enough priority for us to fix right now".
Mine never received a response, not sure if any did.
I have several
Alex, Richard-
Yes, but... three things:
it wouldn't have the authority of the company behind it, in the way
that the Apple store, etc does
I don't recall a link from the runrev site to LiveCode Journal, or
it's somewhere out of the way.
it would look really bad for the company to have this add
Alex Tweedly wrote:
RevOnline has been effectively broken for a long time. Long enough that
we should be able to predict that it won't be fixed any time soon.
And I think that's probably a good resource allocation decision for runrev.
revonline is basically a website to collect stacks and simi
RevOnline has been effectively broken for a long time. Long enough that
we should be able to predict that it won't be fixed any time soon.
And I think that's probably a good resource allocation decision for runrev.
revonline is basically a website to collect stacks and similar
resources, and
Mark Rauterkus writes:
> With Rev Online, can I delete some of my stacks already uploaded? I
> put some junk there in the past that should be deleted.
RevOnline's functionality has been dead for over six months now. To bring it
back you will need to sacrifice a chicken to Papa Legba. If you mana
On 1/10/12 11:10 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Is Rev Online broken? It doesn't seem to be accepting user contributions.
Also, the Browse feature recognizes ".rev" but not ".livecode"
I've been effectively locked out for quite a while now. It won't even
recognize my password any more, and resetting i
I can confirm that Rev Online is down here, too. So are the user comments in
the Dictionary in the IDE. IIRC they are on the same server. I've sent a note
to support asking about it.
Devin
On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:16 AM, René Micout wrote:
> Hello,
> I writed that 9th december 2011 and the resp
Hello,
I writed that 9th december 2011 and the response :
"
Dear René Micout,
Thank you for writing to the help desk for LiveCode.
This is an autoresponse. Your message has been received and assigned a ticket
number.
You should normally expect a response within 2 working days. During
exceptiona
Enviado via iPhone
Em 28/01/2011, às 17:10, zryip theSlug escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>
> Andre,
>
>> Those entries are valid only for PHP and I believe no sane hosting company
>> will ever allow you to set those in a .htaccess file.
>
> Hmmm,
>
> I co
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
Andre,
> Those entries are valid only for PHP and I believe no sane hosting company
> will ever allow you to set those in a .htaccess file.
Hmmm,
I could say I'm doing this all the time, but.. no comment 8-)
Best regards,
--
-Zryip TheSlu
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Calvin Waterbury wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the clarification! I'll keep the 64/32 info in mind when the
> time comes. :)
from what I've seen, 64bit linux is able to run and load 32bit
executables and libraries but in practice, I could never make
RevServe
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the clarification! I'll keep the 64/32 info in mind when the time
comes. :)
Calvin
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
prefer
un...@lists.runrev.com
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:15:11
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Reply-To: How to use LiveCode
> Subject: Re: Rev Online Upload Problems
>
> Dear Slug et al,
>
> I think we're mixing a lot of things in here right now. First the OP asked
> about Rev
How to use LiveCode
Reply-To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Re: Rev Online Upload Problems
Dear Slug et al,
I think we're mixing a lot of things in here right now. First the OP asked
about Rev Online which is not RevServer. Rev Online is the little underused
network sharing stack we all love t
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:05 PM, zryip theSlug wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Martin Koob wrote:
>>
>> Hi Roger.
>>
>> I tried adding those two lines to the .htaccess files and the server really
>> did not like that. I got a 500 server error when I tried to load the site.
>
> Martin,
Dear Slug et al,
I think we're mixing a lot of things in here right now. First the OP asked
about Rev Online which is not RevServer. Rev Online is the little underused
network sharing stack we all love that lives inside LiveCode IDE and we use
to pick other people stacks.
RevServer (aka LiveCode
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Martin Koob wrote:
>
> Hi Roger.
>
> I tried adding those two lines to the .htaccess files and the server really
> did not like that. I got a 500 server error when I tried to load the site.
Martin,
In the .htaccess file of the httpdocs directory?
Hm, the Rev O
Hi Roger.
I tried adding those two lines to the .htaccess files and the server really
did not like that. I got a 500 server error when I tried to load the site.
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Rev-Online-Upload-Problems-tp3230860p3244942
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Martin Koob wrote:
Hi Roger and Martin,
I have no experience with the rev online server however you can try
adding these two lines in the .htaccess file of your domain:
php_value post_max_size 20M
php_value upload_max_filesize 20M
where 20M (20 MBytes) is the n
Roger Guay writes:
>
> I know that there has been some discussion about the unreliability of
> uploading to
> Rev Online, but does
> anyone know if there is size limit?
>
> Thanks and cheers,
>
> Roger Guay
>
Hi. I have just done some testing and the largest file I can get to upload to
55 matches
Mail list logo
