Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Martin, many thanks for this. I shall have a go. ldd is a very useful reminder. Peter -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-LiveCode-6-6-tp4677292p4677478.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 23/03/14 08:45, Peter Alcibiades wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion! I've tried to follow it, but the problem is I can > get detailed instructions for how to install the pango 32 bit libs on > earlier versions of Debian which had the ia32 libs. However this has > vanished from the repositories

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Hi Peter! no, you are not alone. I have pretty much given up on my Linux endevours until the point we see a 64 Bit engine, not only with working with the IDE under Linux, but also in claiming to suppor Linux for my products. Too many hoops to jump through and with the vanishing of ia32 I have n

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Thanks for the suggestion! I've tried to follow it, but the problem is I can get detailed instructions for how to install the pango 32 bit libs on earlier versions of Debian which had the ia32 libs. However this has vanished from the repositories with the latest releases to be replaced by multiarc

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 21/03/14 22:47, Fraser Gordon wrote: On 21/03/2014 19:35, Richmond wrote: Am I to assume that either: 1. The standalones they produce are duds? or 2. The standalones use earlier recensions of the engine The changes that cause incompatibilities with MacOS X 10.5 are part of 6.7, which is s

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 21/03/2014 19:35, Richmond wrote: > Am I to assume that either: > > 1. The standalones they produce are duds? > > or > > 2. The standalones use earlier recensions of the engine The changes that cause incompatibilities with MacOS X 10.5 are part of 6.7, which is still under development and isn't

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Interestingly enough, both 6.6 and 7 allow one to build Mac PPC and Mac Universal standalones. Currently I have no way of testing them: my 2 currently available PPC Macs being divided between my G3 iMac running Mac OS 9.2.2 (a.k.a.'Classic') and my MacMini running Xubuntu 12,04 PPC. Am I to

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 03/21/2014 04:26 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote: No, its broke. ... Maybe there is something else dependency? Since it's worked for others, it might not be correct to say "it's broke". There must be some definable reason it's not working on your system and a dependency issue sounds like the m

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

I have extended my report with attempts on Xubuntu 12.04 LTS. http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19658&p=99712#p99712 Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and m

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 20/03/14 20:13, Warren Samples wrote: > On 03/20/2014 01:45 PM, Richmond wrote: >> I am sorry to say that the middle button: "You Only" does not >> work as it stops with a windows that states this: >> >> "The installer will automatically continue when these conflicting >> applications are closed

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

No, its broke. Logged in as root, navigated to the download, started from the file manager, and I get the same thing, blank window with buttons with no text in them, and it don't work. Running it in a terminal gives no information. I do have mulitarch latest version (debian has dropped ia32 as s

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

No, its broken. Update simply doesn't work. I'll download and try to install from scratch. This is: su to root, cd to /opt/runrev/release-in-question ./livedodexxx Then run the updater and quit LC as soon as downloading starts. The window loses its content and there is no update. Peter

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Here's an incredibly boring and tedious report on an incredibly boring and tedious thing I did just now: Attempted install on UbuntuStudio [Linux] 13.10 32 bit, Mac OS 10.6.7, Mac OS 10.9.2, Windows XP SP2, Windows 7, WINE 1.7.13 of Livecode 6.6.0 stable and 7.0.0 dp-1 Community. http://forum

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 20/03/14 22:58, Warren Samples wrote: On 03/20/2014 03:27 PM, Richmond wrote: I got that message having downloaded the installer, and attempting to install from that rather than via the upgrade system from inside an earlier version. Richmond. Richmond, I just tried it using the downloaded

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 03/20/2014 03:27 PM, Richmond wrote: I got that message having downloaded the installer, and attempting to install from that rather than via the upgrade system from inside an earlier version. Richmond. Richmond, I just tried it using the downloaded installer (both community and commercial

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

I've installed for everyone, so its in /opt. Maybe the thing to do is su to root and then fire up the old version and then do the update and kill the app immediately the download starts... Well. Worth a try. But there must be lots of people who install in /opt, so the installer or updater reall

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 03/20/2014 03:27 PM, Richmond wrote: I got that message having downloaded the installer, and attempting to install from that rather than via the upgrade system from inside an earlier version. Well, that's not good! I hadn't realized you were using the straight installer and was additionall

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 20/03/14 22:13, Warren Samples wrote: On 03/20/2014 01:45 PM, Richmond wrote: I am sorry to say that the middle button: "You Only" does not work as it stops with a windows that states this: "The installer will automatically continue when these conflicting applications are closed: Running

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 03/20/2014 01:45 PM, Richmond wrote: I am sorry to say that the middle button: "You Only" does not work as it stops with a windows that states this: "The installer will automatically continue when these conflicting applications are closed: Running openSUSE with KDE. I just installed by ope

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 20/03/14 21:04, Peter Alcibiades wrote: Debian Jessie running Fluxbox. The updater starts, downloads, then seems to fail to either update or put a new version into /opt/rev. Tried twice. Also the updater loses all its text. I guess maybe update does not work and one has to install from scra

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

Debian Jessie running Fluxbox. The updater starts, downloads, then seems to fail to either update or put a new version into /opt/rev. Tried twice. Also the updater loses all its text. I guess maybe update does not work and one has to install from scratch? Thinking of moving to i3 based on Carl

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

On 20/03/14 20:45, Richmond wrote: I am sorry to say that the middle button: "You Only" does not work as it stops with a windows that states this: "The installer will automatically continue when these conflicting applications are closed: -update" Using the "Custom" button, followed by "Insta

Re: RELEASE: LiveCode 6.6

I am sorry to say that the middle button: "You Only" does not work as it stops with a windows that states this: "The installer will automatically continue when these conflicting applications are closed: -update" Using the "Custom" button, followed by "Install for you only" WORKS. UbuntuStudi

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Benjamin, I hope I can continue to use the old image filtering. The old image filtering was one of good features of LiveCode. Please add it to the next update. set the oldImageFiltering to true Best regards, -- Kenji Kojima / 小島健治 http://www.kenjikojima.com/ On Mar 5, 2014, at 1:27 PM

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Is there any way I can use the old image filtering? It was the best way I could make a mosaic image. But I can not make a mosaic now. The new image filter is a big problem for my applications. Thanks, -- Kenji Kojima / 小島健治 http://www.kenjikojima.com/ On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Benjamin Beau

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Thanks Richard, we really appreciate the support. We appreciate it takes time to open up pre-releases,test and report bugs. So thank you to all those who commit to do this with us every time we release! Thanks again, Ben On 5 March 2014 16:56, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Benjamin Beaumont wrote:

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Benjamin Beaumont wrote: Dear List Members. We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.6 RC1. This release is now considered feature complete. Thanks, Ben. Gentle reminder for all of us: If you want to find bugs BEFORE release, this is the time to start using 6.6. I just install

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Thanks, Neil. On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Neil Roger wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Activation should be working now. Please let us know if you continue to > experience any issues during the activation process. > > Kind Regards, > > > Neil Roger > -- > RunRev Support Team ~ http://www.runrev.com >

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Hi Chris, Activation should be working now. Please let us know if you continue to experience any issues during the activation process. Kind Regards,
 Neil Roger -- RunRev Support Team ~ http://www.runrev.com —— On 05/03/2014 16:10, Chris Sheffield wrote: Anybody else having trouble activati

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Strange. I just tried again (for the 3rd or 4th time) and it worked this time. So all is well. Not sure what the issue was… On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:10 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote: > Anybody else having trouble activating this build? I’ve already sent an email > to support, but thought I’d ask here.

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 RC1

Anybody else having trouble activating this build? I’ve already sent an email to support, but thought I’d ask here. Curious if it’s just me or not. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Sheffield Read Naturally, Inc. www.readnaturally.com On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: > Dear List M

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 23/02/14 20:48, Bob Sneidar wrote: My problem is trying to get the cat to STOP dressing up in drag when I’m not around. Obviously it is trying to ASSERT itself, and OFFSET some of the negative aspects of living with you: Next thing you know it will be Skipping Characters :) Bob On F

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

My problem is trying to get the cat to STOP dressing up in drag when I’m not around. Bob On Feb 23, 2014, at 10:10 , Richmond wrote: > On 23/02/14 20:08, Bob Sneidar wrote: >> But whatever you do, do NOT attempt to take the cat on a long walk after >> getting him intoxicated while listening

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 23/02/14 20:08, Bob Sneidar wrote: But whatever you do, do NOT attempt to take the cat on a long walk after getting him intoxicated while listening to a long symphony. First, the cat is likely not going to go very far if you try to walk him, and secondly alcohol is poison to cats. If you do

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

But whatever you do, do NOT attempt to take the cat on a long walk after getting him intoxicated while listening to a long symphony. First, the cat is likely not going to go very far if you try to walk him, and secondly alcohol is poison to cats. If you don’t believe me and attempt this, your wa

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

>> So my suggestion would be to update errorDialog, maybe make a synonym for >> people used to other languages. And then add an assert control structure (or >> even just modify try to be able to use it in that way). I would not like having this.; they are 2 different beasts and concepts. ( And

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Alright I think I've said what I wanted on assert, so my next problem is with the SQLite syntax changes. The "new" binary mode is in fact just the default SQLite way to use binary. Because of that, I strongly would prefer to make that the default, and deprecate the LC way of storing binary in

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 21.02.2014, at 16:36, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > So my suggestion would be to update errorDialog, maybe make a synonym for > people used to other languages. And then add an assert control structure (or > even just modify try to be able to use it in that way). -- Use an alternative Dict

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 23/02/14 13:43, Thierry Douez wrote: I still think that adding an assert command (of all things) is a completely wrong way to do that tho. Well, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. One of the things I really, really like about Livecode, is the way that there are many ways to do the

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

>> I still think that adding an assert command (of all things) is a >> completely wrong way to do that tho. and Dilbert to the rescue: http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/0//000/20/1//900/210948/210948.strip.zoom.gif Have a nice sunday :) Thierry

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Björnke von Gierke wrote: > I still think that adding an assert command (of all things) is a > completely wrong way to do that tho. What i'd want is this to use > existing capabilities, instead of sidestepping how things work right > now. Maybe a control structure would be a lot more in touch wit

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Hi Bjornke, I just tried a simple assert/assertError. If the assert fails, the commands in the assertError message handler are executed then the original handler still continues to execute, so assert exits the handler to the assertError message handler , then goes back to the original handler. Pe

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

I'm not really "warming up" to the syntax. I'm warming up to the idea, but I like Björnke's thinking on this. One of the things that's been bugging me is that this reminds me of try/catch, but it's not thought-out enough, yet. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > Alri

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Alright, thanks everyone for explaining this. I see now that assert does something that existing capabilities didn't do: Make your own errors up. I still think that adding an assert command (of all things) is a completely wrong way to do that tho. What i'd want is this to use existing capabiliti

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Mark Wieder wrote: >> To bring this new feature to completion I just added a request for a >> global property to turn it off: >> >> AllowAssert global property >> > > Comment added to bug report. > > Richard: if you don't explicitly put in an asse

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

> For example, you may want asserts to be evaluated during testing, but > not in the final product. > > To bring this new feature to completion I just added a request for a > global property to turn it off: > > AllowAssert global property > Com

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Hi Bjornke, Like you, I'm still skeptical about how useful this really is. I'm sensing that LC coders who also work with other more traditional programming languages will be more comfortable with assert. To answer your question though, one example might be a parameter to a function which is always

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Björnke von Gierke wrote: > On 20.02.2014, at 16:37, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> The key point there is that both only catch things the engine >> considers errors. >> >> Assert compliments those by providing for things which may be >> syntactically correct and completely executable, yet are errors

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

I think a nice example stack (perhaps even closer to a final release) put onto revOnline would help everyone. I'd love to know more about this upcoming feature. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > > On 20.02.2014, at 16:37, Richard Gaskin > wrote: > > > The key point

RE: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Subject: Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1 On 20.02.2014, at 16:37, Richard Gaskin wrote: > The key point there is that both only catch things the engine considers errors. > > Assert compliments those by providing for things which may be syntactically correct and completely executable, yet a

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 20.02.2014, at 16:37, Richard Gaskin wrote: > The key point there is that both only catch things the engine considers > errors. > > Assert compliments those by providing for things which may be syntactically > correct and completely executable, yet are errors within the context of the > b

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Björnke von Gierke wrote: > On 16.02.2014, at 22:13, Peter Haworth wrote: > >> Seems like it's really meant to detect the >> infamous "this should never happen" situation rather than expected >> errors., > > Alright, if that is the case, why isn't it done in the engine WITHOUT > adding another c

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 16.02.2014, at 22:13, Peter Haworth wrote: > Seems like it's really meant to detect the > infamous "this should never happen" situation rather than expected errors., Alright, if that is the case, why isn't it done in the engine WITHOUT adding another command? why do WE need to add random c

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Thanks for the explanation Mark. Been prowling around the web for information on assert and I think I'm getting clearer on its use. Seems like it's really meant to detect the infamous "this should never happen" situation rather than expected errors., kinda like a switch default statement to show

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Okay so that means there is corruption in DNS. No surprisingly, since I have a Sprint WiFi cell data dongle which won’t work or work well when I use the default DNS, but when I switch to Google DNS it starts working famously. Another possible cause would be DNS cacheing. Changing the DNS settin

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Pete- Sunday, February 16, 2014, 9:11:23 AM, you wrote: > All valid points. I'm just not seeing any big advantages over using if/then > constructs, but I can see that being a personal preference. Well, one advantage of assert is that the parameters pinpoint exactly where the error occurred, maki

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

All valid points. I'm just not seeing any big advantages over using if/then constructs, but I can see that being a personal preference. Pete lcSQL Software On Feb 16, 2014 4:49 AM, "Trevor DeVore" wrote: > On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Peter Haworth wrote: > > > The assert command seems to have

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Peter Haworth wrote: > The assert command seems to have appeared out of nowhere. Is it on any > plan that anyone has seen? I believe it was added in order to aid with adding test coverage to LiveCode. At least I seem to recall reading something about that in some

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

The assert command seems to have appeared out of nowhere. Is it on any plan that anyone has seen? Anyway, with assert: - --Test Harness using assert - command test1 assert . end test1 command test2 assert . end test2 on

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > Can someone elaborate why assert is better then using "is true/false", and > what additional things it adds? > 'assert' is designed for writing tests for your code. That being the case, if 'assert' fails then the assertError message is

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Bjornke, That was my question exactly. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > Can someone elaborate why assert is better then using "is true/false", and > what additional things it adds? > > I don't feel i can do the following otherwise: "Please do not be afraid to > try i

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Can someone elaborate why assert is better then using "is true/false", and what additional things it adds? I don't feel i can do the following otherwise: "Please do not be afraid to try it out as we need feedback to develop it further." (page 7, http://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/6_6_0/Live

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Richmond- Saturday, February 15, 2014, 11:43:37 AM, you wrote: > and "bingo", everything is lovely. Yay! -- -Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscri

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 15/02/14 21:30, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Hmmm... possible dns resolution issues? Can you ping www.livecode.com ? If not, can you ping 37.59.205.89 ? You might also try reconfiguring your dns settings to point to Google's dns servers at 8.8.8.8 to see if that helps. pinging 37.59.205.8

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Richmond wrote: > Anyway; obviously nothing wrong with RunRev, and quite a lot with my ISP > over here: both in terms of their service, and > in terms of the fact that their people talk unmitigated rubbish. > Sadly, not an unusual situation. It seems many suppor

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Richmond- Hmmm... possible dns resolution issues? Can you ping www.livecode.com ? If not, can you ping 37.59.205.89 ? You might also try reconfiguring your dns settings to point to Google's dns servers at 8.8.8.8 to see if that helps. -- -Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 15/02/14 20:48, Klaus major-k wrote: Am 15.02.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Jim Kanter : All links okay in Atlanta, GA. Same over here in germany! :-) I have just had a majorly stupid conversation with an 'engineer' from my ISP provider who told me this: 1. Maybe the Livecode people have blo

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

All links OK here in Mexico City, too On 15 Feb 2014, at 12:48 PM, Klaus major-k wrote: > > Am 15.02.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Jim Kanter : > >> All links okay in Atlanta, GA. > > Same over here in germany! :-) > >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Richmond >> wrote: >>> >>> here in Bulg

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Am 15.02.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Jim Kanter : > All links okay in Atlanta, GA. Same over here in germany! :-) > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Richmond > wrote: >> >> here in Bulgaria, and they told me that they cannot connect to >> downloads.livecode.com/livecode/ >> or lists.runrev.com: s

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

All links okay in Atlanta, GA. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Richmond wrote: > > here in Bulgaria, and they told me that they cannot connect to > downloads.livecode.com/livecode/ > or lists.runrev.com: so something going on there. > > At the moment I cannot, also, connect with > http://andre

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Me too! And I’m in Brooklyn! So, quite a range of coverage here in the States. On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:50 PM, PystCat wrote: > >If it helps, I can access all of those links here in NY city. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com P

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

If it helps, I can access all of those links here in NY city. Paul > On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Richmond wrote: > >> On 15/02/14 17:07, Marc Van Cauwenberghe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the url seems to be alright to me. >> >> Any news on the sample stacks? >> >> Best regards, >> Marc > > I phon

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 15/02/14 17:07, Marc Van Cauwenberghe wrote: Hi, the url seems to be alright to me. Any news on the sample stacks? Best regards, Marc I phoned the engineers at BLIZOO, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizoo here in Bulgaria, and they told me that they cannot connect to downloads.liveco

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Bug 11814 This bug is caused by setting acceleratedRendering to true On 2/14/14, 5:06 PM, "Michael Gruenthal" wrote: >Just ran a stable in 6.5 iPad (1024 X 768) stack in the iOS 7 retina >simulator. As is, it is scaled down to occupy the bottom left quarter of >the simulator screen, but all obj

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Hi, the url seems to be alright to me. Any news on the sample stacks? Best regards, Marc Op 15-feb.-2014, om 12:48 heeft Richmond het volgende geschreven: > On 14/02/14 20:05, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: >> Dear List Members. >> >> We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.6 DP1. >>

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On 14/02/14 20:05, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: Dear List Members. We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.6 DP1. Warning, this is a pre-release with new features which have the potential to cause issues. Please ensure you backup your stacks before testing this release. *Important Cha

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Don't worry, Peter, I won't. I will speak up when something comes in that makes me go UGH, though. "this me" and the new "assert" syntax also come to mind. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > So don't use it then :-) I'm happy to see SQLite catching up with other > SQL im

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

So don't use it then :-) I'm happy to see SQLite catching up with other SQL implementations. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Mike

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Just ran a stable in 6.5 iPad (1024 X 768) stack in the iOS 7 retina simulator. As is, it is scaled down to occupy the bottom left quarter of the simulator screen, but all objects are actually where they belong e.g. touching a button where it¹s rendered in the bottom left quarter doesn't work, but

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Great. A 25 year step BACKWARDS when it comes to readability. There is nothing readable about recursive code. It might be clever and brief, but it is most definitely NOT readable. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > I see in the release notes that the hope is to include t

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

LiveCode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Subject:  Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1 On Feb 14, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: > *Sample Stacks* > We have included 3 sample stack demonstrating some of the new > features/improvements in this release: > - Stack showing effec

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On Feb 14, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: > *Sample Stacks* > We have included 3 sample stack demonstrating some of the new > features/improvements in this release: > - Stack showing effect of changes in image quality > - Stack showing effect of fullscreenmode on desktop > - Stack s

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

I see in the release notes that the hope is to include the 3.8.3 version of the SQLite library in the final release of 6.6. One of the very cool new features in sqlite 3.8.3 is recursive SELECT statements. Think expanding a bill of materials or a manager/employee chart with one SELECT statement.

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: > - SQLite support updated and improved YES Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin _

Re: RELEASE LiveCode 6.6 DP1

Im sure there are some people very excited about the sqlite update. Very cool. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote: > Dear List Members. > > We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.6 DP1. > > Warning, this is a pre-release with new features which have the pote