Mark, thanks for your in depth exploration of this issue ...
Richard, the coded issue for me is to allow my users to view all youtube
videos as well as any other streaming site that uses h264 ...youtube uses a
different codec for their live stuff and a different one for the archived
stuff. the
On 2018-09-11 07:32, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
So, your binaries would actually be non-GPLv3 licensed; but you would
then be providing the source-code (which you own the copyright to)
under GPLv3 on GitHub.
Whether that works depends on what the requirements on your project
are re
On 2018-09-11 03:14, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
To start with I think you need to ensure that building CEF with
proprietary codecs enabled does not include anything that has a
license that is incompatible with GPL 3. Otherwise you can’t
distribute your standalone with the modified CEF
All this sounds like maybe looking for a GPL-compatible codec may be easier.
Tom, would WebM do what you need?
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/googles-updated-webm-license
https://www.webmproject.org
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop,
On 2018-09-10 10:49, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
Mark - can you find fault in my logic? And if not then if it is put
into LC
it would have a setting for include/exclude as with the other
libraries.
There is not fault in your logic (for the most part) - it is indeed
something we have d
On 2018-09-11 05:03, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
Seems like the GPL issue is in LiveCode’s court. They can specifically
allow linking to non-free libraries as a provision to the GPL license.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FSWithNFLibs
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPL
On 2018-09-11 02:48, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote:
So I got a msg back and they are totally down with me shipping the
codec as
long as I pay the fees for the # of licenses I sell past 100,000
Correct me if I am wrong, can I not put the code of my application on
github as GPL 3? and build my
Maybe I need to email Kevin and tell him more about the project, the
problem and the lack of options. ... thanks for those links the plot
thickens.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:05 PM Brian Milby via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Seems like the GPL issue is in LiveCode’s
Seems like the GPL issue is in LiveCode’s court. They can specifically allow
linking to non-free libraries as a provision to the GPL license.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FSWithNFLibs
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs
Thanks,
Brian
On Sep 10, 2018, 9:23 PM -
Thats what I am thinking too. I will do my best to find a legal
perspective on this.
didn't Runrev have to ship the first LC Community with something
proprietery in it too? I remember seeing a note about it in the installer.
or maybe i was hallucinating.
Why do my standalones have to be G
There’s some questions here that need a lawyer to answer.
To start with I think you need to ensure that building CEF with proprietary
codecs enabled does not include anything that has a license that is
incompatible with GPL 3. Otherwise you can’t distribute your standalone with
the modified CE
So I got a msg back and they are totally down with me shipping the codec as
long as I pay the fees for the # of licenses I sell past 100,000
Correct me if I am wrong, can I not put the code of my application on
github as GPL 3? and build my standalones using LC with the modified CEF
files ?
If s
Lagi Pittas wrote:
> I have read a few articles about this - and I think Livecode doesn't
> have a problem with building it in - here is my take.
Is the licensing compatible with GPLv3?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the W
I read that pricing info as wellwhich is why i am willing to enter into
a contract with them.
interesting.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:49 AM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I have read a few articles about this - and I think Livecode doesn't have
> a pro
I have read a few articles about this - and I think Livecode doesn't have
a problem with building it in - here is my take.
Foe under 100,000 uses/sales/installs (whatever) there is no charge.
100,000 to 250,000 is $25000
I assume Livecode has NOT sold more than 100,000 copies of Indy or
Busin
Hi Monte,
I was hoping that was the case, but I figured luck would have it i would
need to build LC. Good to hear.
The truth is I am not really sure how these fine details work..I definitely
need clarity.
We had to make a pivot with our products the sequence.so we have 2
on the go. one
> On 10 Sep 2018, at 4:02 am, Tom Glod via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> If I do that . I then have to make my own build of CEF, My own build of
> Livecode, and then build my standalones? What could go wrong?LOL
> Is that my only option? I may have to seriously consider doing whatev
f-bomb! ty for those resources Richard.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:48 PM Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Tom Glod wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:36 PM Mark Waddingham wrote:
> >
> >> H264 is patent encumbered - in order to distribute software
> >
Tom Glod wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:36 PM Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
>> H264 is patent encumbered - in order to distribute software
>> containing an implementation you need to license the MPEG-LA patent
>> pool.
>>
>> That's why you won't find any public CEF prebuilts with the flag
>> enable
If I do that . I then have to make my own build of CEF, My own build of
Livecode, and then build my standalones? What could go wrong?LOL
Is that my only option? I may have to seriously consider doing whatever it
takes.
Thanks for the confirmation.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:36 PM Mar
H264 is patent encumbered - in order to distribute software containing an
implementation you need to license the MPEG-LA patent pool.
That's why you won't find any public CEF prebuilts with the flag enabled.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Sep 2018, at 18:04, Tom Glod via u
21 matches
Mail list logo
