Thanks Peter, I hadn't remember seeing that one.
While it is a useful handler, it's hard to see how to extend it to
operate on chunks, because ...
1. it depends on setting the textsize of the field (to handle any
characters not already within a tag). You can't do that if you're
operating ju
On Feb 26, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
> I guess the code will just have to iterate through the chars and change them.
> (oops no, just tried that and it's too slow. I guess the code will need to
> scan through the chars and change each sub-chunk)
There was a handler posted here not
On 26/02/2014 23:52, Peter Haworth wrote:
Hi Alex,
On the un-mixed example, I wonder whether you should set the textstyle to
"plain" or empty?
Neither I'm going to set the textStyle["bold"] to either true or false,
and hence sidestep the empty vs plain question completely.
For the mixed examp
On 26/02/2014 23:31, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 2/26/14, 4:50 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
But the question is
- if the chunk is currently 'mixed', then which of the following
should happen ?
I've seen different ways to do that. What comes to mind is the way
Thunderbird marks/unmarks a group of
Hi Alex,
On the un-mixed example, I wonder whether you should set the textstyle to
"plain" or empty?
For the mixed examples, I'd say 4 in both cases but the problem is that
won't always be what users want or expect. If it's just for your own use,
that's not a problem. If it's a utility for other
On 2/26/14, 4:50 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
But the question is
- if the chunk is currently 'mixed', then which of the following
should happen ?
I've seen different ways to do that. What comes to mind is the way
Thunderbird marks/unmarks a group of selected messages if they have
mixed status
