Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-14 Thread Francis Nugent Dixon
Hi from Beautiful Brittany, Thanks to all (to numerous to mention) for your input. I am happy that many use and like CyberDuck, surprised that nobody appears to use Flow, when it seems to have rave reviews (maybe the developers wrote the reviews :>). Looks like I will stick with CyberDuck. I nev

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Bill Vlahos
Mark, I've used Cyberduck for years and have really liked it…until recently. The newer versions sometimes messes up my files when I upload them to the web site. Most files work fine but some don't that used to. I've reported it to the vendor who cannot reproduce the problem. I've been using Fe

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Jerry Jensen
Francis, Not exactly what you asked, but I'm using Fetch. I like it fine, but next time I have to pay for an upgrade, i plan to go to CyberDuck. .Jerry On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: > Hi from Beautiful Brittany, > > Maybe a little outside LiveCode discussions, but >

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Pete
I use Cyberduck and Taco HTML Edit together to get the benefits of the combined editor/ftp. Cyberduck detetcs the presence of Taco on your computer and includes a contextual menu item to download a file into Taco, then when you save it in Taco it automatically upload to the server again. Pete On

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Andre Garzia
Francis, I like both Interarchy and Transmit http://nolobe.com http://panic.com These days I am using Transmit. =) On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: > Hi from Beautiful Brittany, > > Maybe a little outside LiveCode discussions, but > I want the best app to upload my

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Scott Rossi
Hi Francis: If you want cheap, Flow is on sale at the moment, so it is a great deal. I've used it a bit, though not with On_Rev, and it has worked fine. If you're looking specifically for a Mac solution -- there are other FTP tools that have been around for a while but cost more: Fetch - http://f

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Richmond
Personally I've been using Cyberduck for about 5 years, and don't understand the comments about its clumsy interface; all seems remarkably straightforward to me. Experience with almost all other FTP clients seems to fall short of Cyberduck. But, Hey, I'm talking about sending stuff from my PPC m

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Keith Clarke
...I've used Panic's Transmit for the last 10 years and see no need to change. Best, Keith.. On 13 Mar 2012, at 19:22, Charles E Buchwald wrote: > Hi Francis, > I've used Cyberduck for a couple of years, and like it very much. > Used to use FileZilla, but as Mark said, it's a clumsy interface. >

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Charles E Buchwald
Hi Francis, I've used Cyberduck for a couple of years, and like it very much. Used to use FileZilla, but as Mark said, it's a clumsy interface. Haven't tried Flow. - Charles On 2012-03-13, at 1:19 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote: > Hi Francis, > > I tried CyberDuck but it messed up my file names if t

Re: Cyberduck versus Flow

2012-03-13 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Francis, I tried CyberDuck but it messed up my file names if they contained special characters. I have no experience with Flow. I still use FileZilla, which has a very clumsy interface but works correctly. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering