On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:04 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 11/29/11 10:23 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> I tried that once, but just about the time I had him convinced,
>> Jacque came through the wormhole, tackled me, gave me a noogie and
>> told Kevin I was an alien from another planet with a competing
On 11/29/11 12:12 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Tuesday, November 29, 2011, 10:04:13 AM, you wrote:
On 11/29/11 10:23 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I tried that once, but just about the time I had him convinced,
Jacque came through the wormhole, tackled me, gave me a noogie and
told Kevin I was an
Jacque-
Tuesday, November 29, 2011, 10:04:13 AM, you wrote:
> On 11/29/11 10:23 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> I tried that once, but just about the time I had him convinced,
>> Jacque came through the wormhole, tackled me, gave me a noogie and
>> told Kevin I was an alien from another planet with a c
On 11/29/11 10:23 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I tried that once, but just about the time I had him convinced,
Jacque came through the wormhole, tackled me, gave me a noogie and
told Kevin I was an alien from another planet with a competing
product and to continue his work as planned. How she found tha
I tried that once, but just about the time I had him convinced, Jacque came
through the wormhole, tackled me, gave me a noogie and told Kevin I was an
alien from another planet with a competing product and to continue his work as
planned. How she found that out I will never know!
Bob
On Nov 2
Bob-
Monday, November 28, 2011, 4:44:41 PM, you wrote:
> Whoa! Yes you can! That means I can debug why the message box
> acts that way! to be continued...
Ow! My head! You've gotta watch that stuff... you'll start getting
recursive and end up in one of Jacque's wormholes. Before you know it
you'
On 11/28/11 6:41 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Got it. What an interesting quirk though that if you do re-declare
them, they always resolve to true!
It's the same thing that came up a week or so ago. Getting anything in
the message box returns a boolean, which tells you if the command
succeeded. If
Whoa! Yes you can! That means I can debug why the message box acts that way! to
be continued...
Bob
On Nov 28, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Now let's see, can I use breakpoint in a semicolon delimited single line
> statement...
___
use-l
Got it. What an interesting quirk though that if you do re-declare them, they
always resolve to true! Also, re-declaring them in the multiline message box
has no adverse effect. Works like normal. Not saying anything should be done
about it, I just find it interesting. Now let's see, can I use b
On 11/28/11 5:01 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Wait, you are saying that I can refer to the globals later without
first declaring them to be globals? I did not know that!
No. But once they've been declared already, you don't need to do it
again in the message box when you query their value.
--
Jacq
On 11/28/11 5:09 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
Interesting. I tried using a global from the message box without first
declaring it once. Didn't work for me. Then declared it and it did. What
am I missing?
It has to have been already declared, either in a one-time declaration
in the message box, or
Ok thanks that makes sense. I have a fuzzy recollection in the past that that
didn't work for me but I suspect my coding at that time was fuzzier still.
Bob
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 11/28/11 2:07 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
>> That works famously! It's only in the
Interesting. I tried using a global from the message box without first
declaring it once. Didn't work for me. Then declared it and it did. What
am I missing?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 11/28/11 2:07 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
> That works famously! It's only in t
Yep, messed around with this a bit and it does seem to work fine. If you
need to add a global later on, just declare that one once too and its added
to the list the message box can see. (or so it seems to me)
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Wait, you are saying that I can r
On 11/28/11 2:07 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
That works famously! It's only in the single line message box that
semicolon delimited put statements using globals always resolves to
true. Sounds buggy to me!
The message box has automatic access to any globals that have already
been declared, so you
Wait, you are saying that I can refer to the globals later without first
declaring them to be globals? I did not know that!
Bob
On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> Seems like it should work but..
>
> To get around this weirdness, define the globals once in the message box by
>
Seems like it should work but..
To get around this weirdness, define the globals once in the message box by
themselves at which point they will "stick" and you can use them to your
hearts content.
Meaning:
global gLogonSite,gSiteID -- once
at which point it seems that any and all future reference
Hi all.
I seem to remember this working once, but it does not work now. In the message
box I put:
global gLogonSite,gSiteID;put gLogonSite & "," & gSiteID
I get true. I should be getting something like 0,2. Are semicolons legal in
the message box or no? I know I can use the multiline sect
18 matches
Mail list logo
