On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
> added the highlighted lines below, and then re-ran your tests
>
>as-is using item
>>
>> foreach85 159
>> repeatwith 93 3102
>> countarray 276 367
I added them in mine too. I had to decr
On 20/02/2011 17:13, Colin Holgate wrote:
I just did some timing tests, partly to see if using an array might help with
speed. It didn't, but in doing the test I thought of a neater way of testing
than I've done before.
Usually my testing would resemble this:
...
Then I would type in "onew
Hmmm, no you can't use
if tItem is empty then
exit repeat
end if
because it is perfectly feasible to have empty items within the middle
of the data. You would need to use
if tOffset > the number of chars in tData then exit repeat
or something like that. I'm not sure whether this w
I just did some timing tests, partly to see if using an array might help with
speed. It didn't, but in doing the test I thought of a neater way of testing
than I've done before.
Usually my testing would resemble this:
on oneway
put the milliseconds into t
repeat with a = 1 to 1
On 2/19/11 4:44 PM, "Alex Tweedly" wrote:
>> put 1 into tCurrentItemCharOffset
>> repeat with i = 1 to the number of items in tData
>> ... item 1 of (char tCurrentItemCharOffset to -1 of tData) ...
>> add the number of chars in item 1 of (char tCurrentItemCharOffset
>> to -1 of tData) +
The other day I mentioned the great efficiency that can be gained by
using the form
repeat for each item tItem in tdata
tItem ...
end repeat
rather than the (perhaps more obvious)
repeat with i = 1 to the number of items in tdata
item i of tData ...
end repe
