Actually I got the idea from you. But so far it seems to hold.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On December 9, 2016 8:27:18 PM Mark Wieder wrote:
On 12/09/2016 03:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On
On 12/09/2016 03:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 12/9/16 4:47 PM, mwieder wrote:
But at any rate, I believe conflating "extending" a script with
"concatenation" is the wrong way to think about behaviors.
I think of them as private backscripts, available only the object to
which they are attach
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Barncard
wrote:
> A widget you could create, Sir !
I could, but a the moment the project that I bought livecode for news my
attention itself.
This is kind of a basic functionality of a paid product . . .
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I simply find it odd that the commercial versions of livecode don't include
> installers, myself . . . this is *basic* functionality for anyone looking
> to sell the software . . .
>
A widget you could create, Sir !
--
Stephen Barncard - Seb
On 12/9/16 4:47 PM, mwieder wrote:
But at any rate, I believe conflating "extending" a script with
"concatenation" is the wrong way to think about behaviors.
I think of them as private backscripts, available only the object to
which they are attached. If the behavior doesn't catch a messages,
Tim Bleiler wrote
> Maybe I didn’t explain what I’m actually doing correctly or we’re just
> doing something different, but after I assign the behavior I do NOT get
> the same result.
Er...yes, you're right. That's what happens when I try to multitask and type
without thinking.
The other project I
Dear LiveCode Users,
Last week some of you tested the capability of our XLSX library to
write a xlsx file readable by the existing apps and solutions
compatible with xlsx.
Thanks for all your positives feedbacks.
Today we are going far ahead with a more ambitious step by trying to
open your exis
"Me Too"...
Also, thanks to Tim for putting all these combinations in the lab and
reporting the results back to the community. I learned something valuable!
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:44 PM, mwieder wrote:
>
> I think it's wrong to consider behavior scripts as concatenated onto the end
> of a script. If you rather think of the behavior script as a library or
> backscript, then the message path becomes a little clearer.
Thinking of behaviors as a libra
On 12/9/16 1:49 PM, mwieder wrote:
...and I want to echo your appreciation of Mr. Waddingham's stewardship of
the xtalk legacy. I have argued (and will continue to do so) with him about
fine points of interpretation and future direction of the language, but I
always appreciate his constant conser
SequelPro for sure!
riccardo
> Il giorno 09 dic 2016, alle ore 18:40, Bob Sneidar
> ha scritto:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I am using mySQL as a database server, and MySQLWorkbench as the management
> app. When I do dumps, I am warned that the version of msSQL is newer than my
> version of mySQL serv
...and I want to echo your appreciation of Mr. Waddingham's stewardship of
the xtalk legacy. I have argued (and will continue to do so) with him about
fine points of interpretation and future direction of the language, but I
always appreciate his constant conservative approach to making changes and
Tim-
I think it's wrong to consider behavior scripts as concatenated onto the end
of a script. If you rather think of the behavior script as a library or
backscript, then the message path becomes a little clearer. In your example
2, the message "you are in Script 3" appears because that instance o
I simply find it odd that the commercial versions of livecode don't include
installers, myself . . . this is *basic* functionality for anyone looking
to sell the software . . .
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
use-livecode mailing list
I love using Sequel Pro, use it on a daily base without any problems...
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Warm Regards,
Ton Kuypers
+32 (0) 477 739 530
Steenweg op Leopoldsburg 100 • B-2490 • Balen • Belgium
www.publishingtools4u.com
> On 9 dec. 2016, at 18:40, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> So does anyone have any recommendations for an administration
> tool that is not going to give me problems at a later time? I
> don't mind paying for it if it's not too expensive, but it
> has to run on OS X. I can google it but I'd like a trusted opinion.
Obviously am biased towards Valenti
Thanks Bill. It dawns on me (and the dawn has been coming later and later these
days) that I actually purchased Navicat some years back. I should check to see
if my license is still good.
Bob S
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 10:44 , proth...@earthlearningsolutions.org wrote:
>
> Bob,
> I've used Navic
On Dec 9, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Mark Waddingham
mailto:m...@livecode.com>> wrote:
Rule (2) preserves this semantic for behaviors and, indeed, codifies the fact
that behaviors aren't really objects - they are script extensions (for want of
a better term).
Thank you Mark, your explanation is very
Bob,
I've used Navicat for years. I like it a lot.
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I am using mySQL as a database server, and MySQLWorkbench as the management
> app. When I do dumps, I am warned that the version
On 2016-12-08 21:23, Bleiler, Timothy wrote:
I’m curious about what appears to me to be a confusing aspect of the
implementation of behaviors. In short, behaviors have characteristics
of an isolated, local extension of the message path AND
characteristics of a concatenation of the parent control’
Hi all.
I am using mySQL as a database server, and MySQLWorkbench as the management
app. When I do dumps, I am warned that the version of msSQL is newer than my
version of mySQL server, and because of that there may be problems importing
later. This makes me very nervous.
So does anyone have
On Dec 8, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Mark Wieder
mailto:ahsoftw...@sonic.net>> wrote:
I think the best explanation of the message path is still Richard Gaskin's
chart and web page. Although I have to give props to Dar Scott for his message
primer as well.
I tend to think of behavior scripts (and I know
Very interesting to know, thank you
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
von Peter TB Brett
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Dezember 2016 15:29
An: How to use LiveCode
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Installer software
On 09/12/2016 09:
On 09/12/2016 09:54, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
Hi Peter,
thats interesting. Right now, I pack the 2 video files (total 8 GB) in
10 zip files on DVD and store them when installing in a users choice
location on HD. I would have never thought it would be a good idea to create
one big 8GB app b
Thats exactly, what I am doing and thats why I was a bit puzzled that Peter
recommended to put all 2 files into the bundle.
Perhaps I've misinterpreted Peter
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
von Mark Schonewill
Interesting discussion here. It is possible to make an 8GB app bundle,
since the files inside the bundle are still individual files. It isn't a
good idea to include 8GB of videos in a stack. I wouldn't include all
8GB of files in one installer, since the installer is basically one big
stack (wh
This may well be over-kill for your need for a Windows installer - but in the
past I used SetupBuilder (http://www.lindersoft.com) a lot and found it
excellent even for complex installation scenarios
However starting at $169 it's not particularly cheap and there is a learning
curve - but it does w
Hi Peter,
thats interesting. Right now, I pack the 2 video files (total 8 GB) in
10 zip files on DVD and store them when installing in a users choice
location on HD. I would have never thought it would be a good idea to create
one big 8GB app bundle. Do you think this would be a good idea? Wou
On 09/12/2016 08:17, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
the main reason for me to use installer maker is the feature, to call
a program after the installer has finished (which makes a second part
of installation, extraction and copying 2 videos from 10 zip
files). I don't know, how I could realize t
Hi Paul,
the main reason for me to use installer maker is the feature, to call a program
after the installer has finished (which makes a second part of installation,
extraction and copying 2 videos from 10 zip files). I don't know, how I
could realize this with the classic "drag and drop fr
30 matches
Mail list logo
