I “improved” my script just to check that each time the handler is called it
still gets its own local variables:
on oneOrTwo
local tCount
add 1 to tCount
put "one" && tCount & return after Field "Field"
wait 50 with messages
put "two" && tCount & return after Field "Field"
end oneO
Jacque-
>> If so, what happens to the values of the variables?
> Google idempotent.
Oh, all right.
Each invocation of a function gets its own set of local variables.
Script local variables are in a shared common pool. Changing them from
within a function is commonly referred to as a side effect.
Jacque-
Thursday, January 22, 2015, 7:26:16 PM, you wrote:
> Does the engine queue the second call until the long handler finishes,
Every "wait with messages" call will yield time to the system to allow
other tasks to continue.
> and then send the message from the second call (serial responses)
Jacque
I believe that the engine can start processing the second call before the first
is finished after I did a little experiment:
One card, button1, button2 and a field
Both buttons with this script:
on mouseUp
oneOrTwo
Suppose I have a long handler that includes a few "wait with messages"
so that users can continue interacting with the stack while it runs. The
user does something that calls the long handler while it is still
running from a previous instance. Assume there is no flag in the script
to prevent th
I've never done it, but think i've seen that you can get around issues with
ssl stuff by setting liburlsslverification to false. If I understand
correctly (always in doubt) you'll still end up with an ssl connection, but
if the cert is expired, or off domain or something of that nature, the
connec
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
> Sorry, I've only just realised as I was about to press send that the point
> you were making was that if it was built-in, then it also wouldn't need to
> evaluate both outcomes. Good point - though I'd personally still tend to
> restrict t
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> > repeat for each word theProp in "a b c"
> >set the theProp of me to empty
> > end repeat
> >
>
> That's correct, but the contents of theProp variable should still be
> interpret
Gerry:
It seems to be working for me now, though in LC 7.0.1 and 7.0.2. Now I’m
thrashing through the permissions forest to get access to my db.
Regards,
Bill
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Gerry wrote:
>
> There's a httpHeaders bug in recent versions of LiveCode. Andre Garzia has
> been havin
Thanks Mike and Peter, that's indeed got me to the next stage.
Using this technique I can get curl to work correctly (and by using
env/printenv as the command, I can see the differences in the environment) -
as you suspected, the difference is in PATH.
Now the next question (which brings it b
On 21/01/2015 15:53, Geoff Canyon wrote:
the obvious drawback of the way it is now is that both outcomes have
> to be evaluated, where in an if statement, obviously, only one of them is.
True, but (coding style preference) I tend to use it pretty much only for
constants. If there's a complex
There's a httpHeaders bug in recent versions of LiveCode. Andre Garzia has been
having problems with it in his Facebook lib - perhaps he has a workround?
Gerry
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Jan 2015, at 4:33 am, William Prothero wrote:
>
> httpHeaders
_
Hi Dave
Because tonight's "Create it with LiveCode" webinar tanked (GoToWebinar's
issue, not RunRev's) I have some spare time so I got active and after a bit
of googling I found this
https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/470/maybe-windows-10s-spartan-isnt-going-suck
In short it seems that S
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> doesn't the presence of "the" and "of " indicate that
> the reference is to a (custom) property not a variable
>
You can store the name of a custom property in a variable, even one with
the same name as some other custom property. So there'
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> repeat for each word theProp in "a b c"
>set the theProp of me to empty
> end repeat
>
That's correct, but the contents of theProp variable should still be
interpreted as a custom property name, not a variable because of "the" and
"of me"
Alejandro,
I have been playing with your script. I don't understand why I am
getting the same value returned from:
put offset(tStart,temp1) into tThumbstart
put offset(tEnd,temp1) into tThumbEnd
In my testing tThumbstart and tThumbEnd are equal which does not make sense to
me since t
Dang! Just solved it. The syntax for getting the $_POST variable in php is:
$_POST[“fullame”]
the underscore was the problem.
Regards,
Bill
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:33 AM, William Prothero wrote:
>
> Folks:
> This simple code inexplicably stopped working. LC 7.0.1 and 7.0.2 (rc1),
> Yosemite on
Folks:
This simple code inexplicably stopped working. LC 7.0.1 and 7.0.2 (rc1),
Yosemite on Mac. I’m setting up my mySQL database code and accessing the db’s
thru php. This code worked at first, then after I did a bit of changing, it
stopped. Reverting to the initial working code didn’t work.
Of course. I´ve uploaded it now to my dropbox.
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/o5zfiiqg4q8d163/index.html
> Am 22.01.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Trevor DeVore :
>
> Matthias,
>
> I'm traveling this week. Would you be able to post what I sent you for
> Peter to download?
>
> --
> Trevor DeVore
> ScreenSte
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D <
matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de> wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> yes, but only with an external.
>
> Trevor Devore created such an external.
>
> ...
>
> Maybe you ask him, if he is willing to share it with you.
> But i am pretty sure, he will do.
>
Hi Al!
Thanks so much for taking the time to look into this and sorry for my late
reply. I was on the road without any access to the interwebs the last 3 days.
Looking at your script it makes a lot of sense, however, I can not get it to
work if the images I have here. The resulting jpeg Data i
I've been remiss about digging into the details of Windows 10 (and spartan) -
for those who have been keeping more up to date with Windows developments -
could you let us know if there any implications for LiveCode developers in
their proposed changes?
Thanks!
Dave
-
"Some are born coders,
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Ken Ray wrote:
>
> I use a similar inline "switch":
>
>put stsSwitch(the platform,"MacOS=Finder","Win32=Explorer","*=Desktop")
> into tReference
One line can accomplish that even without invoking a custom function:
put item itemOffset( the platform, "MacOS,
> Le 21 janv. 2015 à 18:54, Ken Ray a écrit :
>
> easier/shorter then:
>
>switch (the platform)
>case "MacOS"
>put "Finder" into tReference
>break
>case "Win32"
>put "Explorer" into tReference
>break
>default
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
