A good way to track this would be to get projects to publish machine
readable meta-data about their projects. DOAP is one standard for
this, and is extensible.
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/doap.xml
OSS Watch have created a registry project that provides mechanisms to
create, store and sea
Hey Allan!
Allan Caeg wrote:
> Sounds good, Gabriel. I think that's the entire list of "standards"
> that we should look at.
>
>
> The topic of GNOME standards for the idea of "GNOME Apps" for GNOME
> 3.0 may have already been discussed in detail somewhere else. If it
> has been, please point it
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 10:46 +0800, Allan Caeg wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Got this idea about starting an initiative to recognize apps that
> comply with GNOME standards, which may or may not be limited to the
> HIG. I'm not sure what else to consider.
>
>
> The motivation behind is to pay homage to
Allan:
Got this idea about starting an initiative to recognize apps that comply
with GNOME standards, which may or may not be limited to the HIG. I'm
not sure what else to consider.
The motivation behind is to pay homage to those deserving projects,
promote the use of those apps vs. noncomplia
