On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:07 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Is there still time to discuss the need for the Interface tab? It will
> be gone in 2.30.
>
> Of course, it can be changed with gconf-editor, but I don't consider
> that to be a good solution.
The solution will be by 2.32 hopefully. The moc
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 17:38 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
> From: Cosimo Cecchi
>
> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:44 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
> >
> >> In the gtk side, I don't know much about the XSettings, but I suppose
> >> that you are talking more general, and XSetting will manage all the
> >> gtk modules
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 21:11 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 14:57 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Widgets
> > [...]
> > - Others?
>
> This might be off topic, depending amongst others what is still
> considered a widget, and I'm not sure what's the correct terminology for
> this,
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:06 +0100, Filippo Argiolas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Heya,
> Hey,
>
> > Widgets
> > ---
> >
> > Having often used widgets in GTK+ means that we reduce differences in
> > appearance and behaviour between applications and make ap
Mathias made the patch
(http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=118981 ) to
make at-spi support XSettings.
>From a11y side, gail and atk-bridge/atk-adaptor, as GTK+ modules, should
be able to be loaded at any time. If there is no registry daemon
running, for CORBA version, at-spi-r
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
Hey,
> Widgets
> ---
>
> Having often used widgets in GTK+ means that we reduce differences in
> appearance and behaviour between applications and make applications
> easier to maintain.
>
> If the APIs are carefully thought of, us
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:54 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:44 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
>
> > In the gtk side, I don't know much about the XSettings, but I suppose
> > that you are talking more general, and XSetting will manage all the
> > gtk modules to be loaded (engines, and
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:22 +0800, Li Yuan wrote:
> Mathias made the patch
> (http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=118981 ) to
> make at-spi support XSettings.
>
> >From a11y side, gail and atk-bridge/atk-adaptor, as GTK+ modules, should
> be able to be loaded at any time. If th
Li and I had talked about this in Ireland last April. I remember from
the conversation that dynamically loading the a11y modules after an
application has already started was probably OK, but that unloading
them while the app was still running would cause them to crash. Li -
is this still not t
On 22 Feb 2010, at 17:17, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Matthew Paul Thomas wrote on 22/02/10 17:13:
>>
>> This patch makes small changes to the HIG's "Progress windows" section.
>>
>> * New: "A progress window should always appear as an independent
>> window in a window list. If progress of a t
Hi!,
On lun, 2010-03-01 at 14:57 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Theming
> ---
>
> Just a couple of opened questions:
> - GTK+ 3.0 theme. How final are the widget set used in the various
> mockups that were posted during the UX hackfest? Cody mentioned that
> this is something he might be a
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:06 +0100, Filippo Argiolas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > Heya,
>> In Cheese we'd like to have something that I'd call ButtonGroup,
>> ToggleButtonGroup or RadioButtonGroup, some
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Filippo Argiolas wrote:
[cut]
> Well it's not actually the radio functionality that I really care,
> that's easily implementable. It's more the custom container that can
> be themed to visually merge together several buttons. Once that's
> done, the buttons could
13 matches
Mail list logo
