On 22 Feb 2010, at 17:17, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:

> Matthew Paul Thomas wrote on 22/02/10 17:13:
>> 
>> This patch makes small changes to the HIG's "Progress windows" section.
>> 
>> * New: "A progress window should always appear as an independent
>> window in a window list. If progress of a task makes a window
>> temporarily unusable, do not present a modal dialog-like progress
>> window in front of it. Instead, present progress somewhere in the
>> original window, making all its other elements temporarily
>> insensitive."
>> 
>> * Removed: "Progress windows should have the same title as their
>> primary text." (This guideline has often caused redundancy in
>> progress windows, e.g.
>> <http://www.dedoimedo.com/images/computers/pendrivelinux_ubuntu_installing.jpg>.
>> It also usually causes the window
>> title to inappropriately use header capitalization.)
>> 
>> * Added: "Progress windows should have a title representing the
>> overall operation: for example “Copying Files”, “Installing”, or
>> “Calling”. (As with other window titles, do not end progress window
>> titles with an ellipsis.)"
> 
> Attached.

Have just submitted a slightly-modified version of this patch (attached), which 
improves the tagging, updates the "What's New" section, and bumps the stable 
version of the HIG to 2.2.1.  Have made the same changes to the unstable 
version, which is bumped to 2.3.1.

Cheeri,
Calum.

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer     Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum.ben...@sun.com            OpenSolaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum             +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems

Attachment: windows-patch.diff
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Reply via email to