I think Chad has a point with the vanishing menus.
I had never thought to much about it, but my eyes are much faster than my
hands. If I want to use the menu the first thing I do is to move my eyes to
the top bar, they arrive there and see an empty space. I feel slightly
frustrated. Then my mouse
Hi,
As I said before I don't like the new "spatial memory" idea. It may
work if the computer is used and administered by a single person. But
it is clearly a bad idea if the computer is shared or administered by
another person.
The whole idea is that the system starts without any applications at
> Display a flat list of all application launchers, excluding system
> tools and file viewers. Here's my reasoning:
>
> The default applications list should exclude system tools (because
> they aren't applications from an end-user perspective) and file
> viewers (because they aren't useful when la
I have never used OS X, so I can not comment about it.
I have always thought that it was easier to navigate the application
menu from the Gnome 2
when compared to windows messy starting menu where applications were
everywhere and could easily grow to an unusable state. So I don't
think the messy w
d a games/devtools category at all.
> I do think it is best to leave that categorization to the user. And it is
> done best by sorting them to pages. With that concept we could still
> pre-define categories, but let the user customize them the way he wants.
>
> Yours sincerelly, Báli
hope that Unity, more specifically the Application Lens, can
better support browsing by categories in the future.
best,
Paulo
2012/6/12 pjssi...@gmail.com :
> I will use the opportunity to point out one of the major problems in
> the Dash, IMHO. IN my home I am the only one using unity, m
I will use the opportunity to point out one of the major problems in
the Dash, IMHO. IN my home I am the only one using unity, my two sons
and my wife use Gnome and The Dash is the reason.
Let me explain. I thin the Dash is very good to find applications and
documents by searching. It is great to
s is
> correct.
>
> Note that whilst this description is for a 2 seat configuration, it could
> work just as easily with 3 or more seats.
> The only thing I can't think of at the moment is how to detect non-input
> devices (external hard drives, etc) and more importantly, how
>
> In other words, even if the design requirements can be discussed
> before the low-level stuff, it's outside the scope of this list.
>
I am not completely sure about this statement. Surely there is a great
part of the setup that is too low level to be considered here. But it
would be nice to co
Hello,
I would like to make a suggestion: make multiseat configuration easy in Ubuntu.
Since I am not sure that this is the right mailing list to post this
idea I am going to try to keep the email relatively small. If I should
wirte somewhere else please let me know.
First I need to explain what
I enthusiastically support this! As I just said in another message, it
would make the life of my small kid easier...
best,
Paulo
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> In lenses, it is not obvious what the filters do, if anything at all. It
> might be understood as the se
Dear Adrian,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Adrian Maier wrote:
> Wow , that's a shocking suggestion : in order to see what's
> available I need to start an application.
> And this is supposed to be a progress compared to the old-style
> desktop environments that can display a quick list of c
> I've mentioned it, but it was shot down on the grounds that dodge was
> found to be confusing to certain users in testing. This means it is
> obviously not strictly superior.
I don't think this is certain. It is certain that dodge windows was
considered confusing when used as default option in t
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Petko wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 12:13 AM, pjssi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Because in this case it is not that clear for me how a user would find its
>> way to open the first application. There is no launcher, there is no menu
>> labeled
I'll jump in...
> It's ok, by default the launcher must be never hide, I prefer this behavior
> for newbies.
Disclaimer: I am a scientist (I really am), not a priest. So, if a
well made test shows that a feature is confusing, even if I like, I
can accept to let it go. Moreover I certainy agree wi
15 matches
Mail list logo
