On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
>>
>> Looks like this won't just be a problem with nautilus either, it looks
>> like the future development for all their apps is giving them interfaces
>> that are ONLY optimized for
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 15:58 -0400, Brandon Watkins wrote:
> I've noticed some poor usability when it comes to ubuntu's lightdm and
> multiple users. Mainly: If any of the users are logged in you can't
> reboot.
>
> Example: Lets say you have 3 users logged in. You are logged into the
> admin accou
I've noticed some poor usability when it comes to ubuntu's lightdm and
multiple users. Mainly: If any of the users are logged in you can't reboot.
Example: Lets say you have 3 users logged in. You are logged into the admin
account. You try and reboot from your session, it just kicks you right to
t
Removing useful views and options, tons of wasted and empty space,
pointlessly huge interface elements...
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
>
>> Looks like this won't just be a problem with nautilus either, it looks
I've noticed with ubuntu 12.04 apport is enabled by default. Now I see the
value in having a larger base of users reporting crash data, but this can
really make ubuntu seem unstable and buggy to a new user, definitely not a
good impression if ubuntu wants more mainstream usage. I get these damn
pop
Hello,
Am 04.07.2012 18:21, schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote on 07/06/12 11:59:
>> If all you have to communicate is On/Off, what is wrong with
>> checkboxes? They do have unclear target areas (in proper
>> implementations, the label is clickable, too), but are well
>> establis
I think the proposal to swap Nautilus with Marlin should at least be made part
of the agenda for discussion/consideration at UDS-R.
Some of the things GNOME is removing from nautilus is probably good. When it
officially lands, it may not be that bad. But regardless, it never hurts to
discuss t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Wilms wrote on 07/06/12 11:59:
>
> On 06/06/2012 10:28 PM, Hans Heintze wrote:
>>
>> The menu specifications for Quantal Quetzal include
>> right-aligned toggle switches. I am concerned that the
>> combination of left and right aligned menu
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
> Looks like this won't just be a problem with nautilus either, it looks
> like the future development for all their apps is giving them interfaces
> that are ONLY optimized for touch, and not giving a damn about
> desktop/laptops:
>
> http:/
Looks like this won't just be a problem with nautilus either, it looks like
the future development for all their apps is giving them interfaces that
are ONLY optimized for touch, and not giving a damn about desktop/laptops:
http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/
On Tue,
10 matches
Mail list logo