Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 04/02/13 23:03, Mark Einon wrote: Ok. So the device doesn't have a driver loaded, so it is a kernel issue... It knows it's a ralink device (PCI vendor ID 0x1814) but doesn't know what the device ID is. Can you please run, to find out what this ID is: $> lspci --nn > ~/pcilist.txt and copy t

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Einon
On 5 February 2013 08:58, Rowan Berkeley wrote: > On 04/02/13 23:03, Mark Einon wrote: >> >> >> Ok. So the device doesn't have a driver loaded, so it is a kernel >> issue... It knows it's a ralink device (PCI vendor ID 0x1814) but >> doesn't know what the device ID is. Can you please run, to find

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 05/02/13 09:48, Mark Einon wrote: On 5 February 2013 08:58, Rowan Berkeley wrote: Hi, Mark. Thanks for the thoughts. ~/pcilist.text: No such file or directory Ah, ok. Not sure what when on there - perhaps you could just try 'lspci --nn' and copy the printout the way you know works? The P

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Einon
On 5 February 2013 10:51, Rowan Berkeley wrote: > I think the double dash in --nn is wrong, should be a single dash. Yep, sorry about that - my bad. > -nn Show both textual and numeric ID's (names and numbers) > lspci -nn > 04.00.0 Network controller [0280]: Ralink corp. RT3290 > Wireless 802.11

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 05/02/13 11:32, Mark Einon wrote: It appears that the chip you have is quite new, and is only supported for newer kernels - for some reason I had it in my head that the laptop was quite old. As you have a 2.5.0 kernel, I assume you're on 12.04 - so I think this may help, short of compiling a n

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 05/02/13 11:55, Rowan Berkeley wrote: No, the machine is running 12.10, but I downgraded the kernel to 3.5.0-22 because I broke 3.5.0-23's Ethernet interface somehow with my tinkering. So, before proceeding with your suggestion, I decided to reinstall 3.5.0-23 and see if it worked. And when I

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 05/02/13 12:49, Rowan Berkeley wrote: I've given the machine a complete 12.10 reinstall from the USB stick, so as to start again without the ill effects of whatever I did previously, fixing which could have gone on forever. In a minute I shall be able to see what I've got and what I've not.

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Einon
On 5 February 2013 13:36, Rowan Berkeley wrote: > On 05/02/13 12:49, Rowan Berkeley wrote: >> >> >> I've given the machine a complete 12.10 reinstall from the USB stick, so >> as to start again without the ill effects of whatever I did previously, >> fixing which could have gone on forever. In a m

[ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Barry Drake
Hi there I've just got my new computer from pcspecialist. I can't get it to boot with any version of Ubuntu later than 10.04. It also won't boot with the latest version of Mint although a Jan 2011 download boots OK. The motherboard is ASUSĀ® F1A55-M LK R2.0: FM1 A-SERIES, SATA 3.0GB/s

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
Hi Mark, Here we are. I can see what I did wrong: I screwed up r8169, which is the Ethernet driver, thinking it was maybe a rival wireless driver. Definitely my bad. uname -a linuc rowan-Compaq 3.5.0-23-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP [date & time] sudo lshw -C network *-network description: Ethernet

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Simon Greenwood
On 5 February 2013 17:33, Barry Drake wrote: > Hi there I've just got my new computer from pcspecialist. I can't > get it to boot with any version of Ubuntu later than 10.04. It also won't > boot with the latest version of Mint although a Jan 2011 download boots OK. > > The motherboard is

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Dave Rice
Hi Barry, I've just seen your post on the pcs forum too, I'm awaiting a new Optimus IV laptop! Have you tried booting the live cd in text only mode? on the grub menu, edit the boot command and either change the "splash" to "nosplash" or put "nosplash" at the end before the double minus signs. h

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Dave Morley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/02/13 19:23, Dave Rice wrote: > Hi Barry, > > I've just seen your post on the pcs forum too, I'm awaiting a new > Optimus IV laptop! > > Have you tried booting the live cd in text only mode? > > on the grub menu, edit the boot command and eit

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Einon
On 5 February 2013 17:47, Rowan Berkeley wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Here we are. I can see what I did wrong: I screwed up r8169, which is the > Ethernet driver, thinking it was maybe a rival wireless driver. Definitely > my bad. > > uname -a > linuc rowan-Compaq 3.5.0-23-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP [date &

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Rowan Berkeley
On 05/02/13 19:29, Mark Einon wrote: Ok, looks like the same issue, in that the kernel isn't quite recent enough to support this device. I'd suggest giving the instructions in the link I posted earlier a go. It may need to be patched to work, if so, It's not a biggie - let me know if it doesn't

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Another example of how the manufacturers conspire to ensure that if you don't use Windows you're screwed

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Einon
On 5 February 2013 20:15, Rowan Berkeley wrote: > > It worked! Yay! \o/ >Now, we need some way of directing people away from all the > erroneous Ubuntu Forums pages that also say [SOLVED] but don't work, like > the one I followed, which was: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1850267

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread alan c
On 05/02/13 17:33, Barry Drake wrote: Hi there I've just got my new computer from pcspecialist. I can't get it to boot with any version of Ubuntu later than 10.04. It also won't boot with the latest version of Mint although a Jan 2011 download boots OK. The motherboard is ASUSĀ® F1A55-M

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Barry Drake
On 05/02/13 19:28, Dave Morley wrote: Barry if you hit any key as soon as you see the keyboard that the bottom of the screen you will see a menu and along the bottom you should see some boot options try flipping a few of those and see if it boots. The other thing you can try is enable legacy mo

Re: [ubuntu-uk] My new computer won't boot Ubuntu ....

2013-02-05 Thread Kris Douglas
On 5 February 2013 23:16, Barry Drake wrote: > On 05/02/13 19:28, Dave Morley wrote: >> >> Barry if you hit any key as soon as you see the keyboard that the bottom >> of the screen you will see a menu and along the bottom you should see some >> boot options try flipping a few of those and see if i