On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 23:46 +0100, Bruce Beardall wrote:
> Michael Douglas wrote:
> > alan c wrote:
> >
> > > I recently decided to try the proposed Ubuntu One facility, and got
> > > myself on a waiting list.
> > >
> > > Any ideas of timescales please, anyone?
> > >
> > >
> > I gave u
Well, I decided to remove it from the system. I like it, but until I get
used to Ubuntu more, I will keep it stored then install it some other
time. It looks good though. I'm glad that I found it.
Thanks everybody.
John.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
Yay, well I hate giving up. I decided to try once more, and as I had my
Maclin folder on the Desktop and trying to install it from there, I
decided to transfer it to a Downloads folder and try again. It worked
that time. I have no idea why it wouldnt recognise it on the Desktop,
but it is now i
I am beginning to feel that I am going round in ever decreasing circles
and I am getting worried that I might disappear. I have 2 desktop
machines both running Ubuntu 9.04 one of which is relatively new and the
other which has been running Ubuntu from the day Ubuntu started.
xorg.conf on the old ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
there seems to be a movie called ubuntu tribe, a trailer is here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZGZlXpHB2g
the url for themovie is meant to be www.ubuntutribe.com this fails as
its a phamacy site, any know what the proper url is to download the
norman wrote:
> xorg.conf on the old machine has lots of stuff in it including some
> references to Wacom which are commented out. On the new machine there
> are very few entries in xorg.conf and no reference at all to Wacom. On
> neither machine does the circular pad work.
Can you post us the xo
2009/6/17 Paul Sutton :
> there seems to be a movie called ubuntu tribe, a trailer is here
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZGZlXpHB2g
>
> the url for themovie is meant to be www.ubuntutribe.com this fails as
> its a phamacy site, any know what the proper url is to download the
> movie. yes I h
> Can you post us the xorg.conf from the old machine?
Yes
# /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool,
using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the /etc/X11
Most configuration is now done for x.org with hal, which is why a lot of
the options in your old x.org config file have been commented out. Look
in /etc/hal/fdi/policy to see if there are any files relating to the
wacom tablet. It may be named 10-linuxwacom.fdi, or something similar.
If not r
Alan Bell wrote:
> you can bypass the queue by getting someone to share something with you
> . . . you have mail . . .
>
> alan c wrote:
>
>> I recently decided to try the proposed Ubuntu One facility, and got
>> myself on a waiting list.
>>
>> Any ideas of timescales please, anyone?
>>
>>
norman wrote:
> # /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
Yes, your old xorg.conf has got all the normal wacom stuff commented out
(but it looks as though it never had the 'pad' section that makes the
circular pad work).
In 8.04, my xorg.conf has these four wacom se
You'll be lucky to find anything to download other than the
trailer ... it was an entry into a viral marketing competition, and no
short film was ever made.
-n
On 17 Jun 2009, at 17:24, Paul Sutton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> there seems to be a movie
I recently installed Ubuntu 9.04. When it boots and I log in, I get a
very large screen resolution which makes everything too small. I think
it is 1280 x something. I want it set to 1152 x 864, and every time
after logging in I have to access the Nvidia settings to change the
resolution. If I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David King wrote:
> I recently installed Ubuntu 9.04. When it boots and I log in, I get a
> very large screen resolution which makes everything too small. I think
> it is 1280 x something. I want it set to 1152 x 864, and every time
> after logging
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=4367&tag=nl.e550
Can Ubuntu make it in the software world beyond where it is? Will
Canonical pay to put it on mobiles?
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
An Israeli company has put together a version of Linux based on Ubuntu
and that looks and acts more like Windows, which could be a good way of
getting Windows users to switch. It can also switch to a Mac-like
interface with a simple mouse click or two.
http://www.affordy.com/
However, if you d
Steve Cook wrote:
Have you tried using System > Preferences > Display
Of course, it was the first thing I tried.
It just gives an error message as follows:
It appears that your graphics driver does not support the necessary
extensions to use this tool. Do you want to use yo
David King wrote:
> An Israeli company has put together a version of Linux based on Ubuntu
> and that looks and acts more like Windows, which could be a good way of
> getting Windows users to switch. It can also switch to a Mac-like
> interface with a simple mouse click or two.
>
> http://www.af
On 17 Jun 2009, at 22:29, David King wrote:
> An Israeli company has put together a version of Linux based on Ubuntu
> and that looks and acts more like Windows, which could be a good way
> of
> getting Windows users to switch. It can also switch to a Mac-like
> interface with a simple mouse cl
> Hmm, to be honest I can already make Ubuntu more Windows-like for free.
> I did this with Ubuntu to make it look a bit like Vista for my other
> half. I think now though if I wanted a more Windows like experience I'd
> probably choose Linux Mint.
I was going to say the same... the "Mac" mode is
David King wrote:
> It just gives an error message as follows:
>
> It appears that your graphics driver does not support the necessary
> extensions to use this tool. Do you want to use your graphics driver
> vendor's tool instead?
>
> NoYes
>
> If I click on Yes, it takes me
John wrote:
> Alan Bell wrote:
>
>> you can bypass the queue by getting someone to share something with you
>> . . . you have mail . . .
>>
>> alan c wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I recently decided to try the proposed Ubuntu One facility, and got
>>> myself on a waiting list.
>>>
>>> Any ideas of t
the only remaining question is who will sue them first? Microsoft for
multiple trademark issues, Canonical for the horrible bastardisation of
the Ubuntu logo or the FSF for failing to release source code and
wrapping it up behind a 16 boot crippleware wrapper.
My bet is on Microsoft to take acti
On 17 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Alan Bell
wrote:
> the only remaining question is who will sue them first? Microsoft for
> multiple trademark issues, Canonical for the horrible bastardisation
> of
> the Ubuntu logo or the FSF for failing to release source code and
> wrapping it up behind a 16 boot
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:21 PM, James Milligan wrote:
>
> Yeah I'd go with that too. Although I'm not a betting man (kid)
>
Their whole website is actually very destructive; the implication being that
Linux is not accessible to Windows users which is simply not true.
I think it's actually rat
Hi I was wondering if anybody knows of an Image Hosting that works with
Ubuntu. I did use Photobucket and Webshot, but neither work with Linux.
I tried Imageshack, but cant get that to work either.
Anyone?
Thank you.
John
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All of the listed sites work for me under all Linux derivatives, what
exactly is the issue when you try to use them? Is there an error, if so
what does it say or what is are the symptoms?
Best of luck,
Chris.
John wrote:
> Hi I was wondering if anybo
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Christopher Swift <
christopher.sw...@linux.com> wrote:
> All of the listed sites work for me under all Linux derivatives, what
> exactly is the issue when you try to use them? Is there an error, if so
> what does it say or what is are the symptoms?
I was going
Sean Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Christopher Swift
> mailto:christopher.sw...@linux.com>> wrote:
>
> All of the listed sites work for me under all Linux derivatives, what
> exactly is the issue when you try to use them? Is there an error,
> if so
> what does i
29 matches
Mail list logo
