On 2012-11-27 18:39, Liam Proven wrote:
> I think what would put me off KVM slightly is that it means installing
> a Linux system, installing KVM on it, configuring the whole thing,
> updating it, locking it down... and then building a VM on top of that.
>
> ESXi is 32MB of code. Install it, conne
Paul,
In a superb case of timing I did exactly this last week...
I have a very old box that backs up the contents of my home server
every week.
It all started as I wanted NFS4 on the backup server (see my other
thread), and as Dapper has gone e
On 27 November 2012 16:30, Alan Bell wrote:
> On 27/11/12 15:49, Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I think it is foolish and even suicidal of VMware to depend upon
>> Windows for management, but what can you do...
>
> you can use KVM, it works great on the server side and there is a nice GUI
> client
On 27/11/12 15:49, Liam Proven wrote:
FWIW, I think it is foolish and even suicidal of VMware to depend upon
Windows for management, but what can you do...
you can use KVM, it works great on the server side and there is a nice
GUI client for the Linux desktop that allows you to see what your VM
On 27 November 2012 14:42, Paul Tansom wrote:
> ** Liam Proven [2012-11-27 14:49]:
>> On 27 November 2012 14:13, Paul Tansom wrote:
>> > I have a server (i.e. no desktop software, X, or etc. - not that this
>> > necessarily follows, but it does with me!)...
>> >
>> > ...anyway, this server is c
** Liam Proven [2012-11-27 14:49]:
> On 27 November 2012 14:13, Paul Tansom wrote:
> > I have a server (i.e. no desktop software, X, or etc. - not that this
> > necessarily follows, but it does with me!)...
> >
> > ...anyway, this server is currently running Ubuntu 6.06LTS and I need to
> > upg
On 27 November 2012 14:13, Paul Tansom wrote:
> I have a server (i.e. no desktop software, X, or etc. - not that this
> necessarily follows, but it does with me!)...
>
> ...anyway, this server is currently running Ubuntu 6.06LTS and I need to
> upgrade to 12.04LTS. Clearly I have two options, ei
On 27/11/12 14:13, Paul Tansom wrote:
> I have a server (i.e. no desktop software, X, or etc. - not that this
> necessarily follows, but it does with me!)...
>
> ...anyway, this server is currently running Ubuntu 6.06LTS and I need to
> upgrade to 12.04LTS. Clearly I have two options, either upgr
I'd recommend a fresh install really. Customise the iso a bit. There's
also a dpkg command to save a list of everything you've got installed
now and then you can work backwards from this text file and install only
what you had (plus or minus package changes through versions). This
saves time stripp
I have a server (i.e. no desktop software, X, or etc. - not that this
necessarily follows, but it does with me!)...
...anyway, this server is currently running Ubuntu 6.06LTS and I need to
upgrade to 12.04LTS. Clearly I have two options, either upgrade or reinstall.
Reinstall seems safer, bar t
On 8 November 2011 10:16, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I am using 11.04 with, what I assume to be, the original Gnome desktop.
> My computer is not particularly sophisticated being about 5 years old
> and I would like to know whether I am likely to encounter a whole lot of
> new problems to solve s
>
> Yes - try 11.10 from the live-CD. If you like it, install it. If you
> prefer the Gnome desktop, consider using XUbuntu. On an older box, it
> might suit you better. Again, run it from the live-CD until you are
> sure it's what you want. If the live-CD does everything you want, Ok.
On 08/11/11 10:16, Norman Silverstone wrote:
I am using 11.04 with, what I assume to be, the original Gnome desktop.
My computer is not particularly sophisticated being about 5 years old
and I would like to know whether I am likely to encounter a whole lot of
new problems to solve should I decide
: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
To: Ubuntu-Uk
ReplyTo: Ubuntu-Uk
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] upgrade to 11.10
Sent: 8 Nov 2011 10:16
I am using 11.04 with, what I assume to be, the original Gnome desktop.
My computer is not particularly sophisticated being about 5 years old
and I would like to know
I am using 11.04 with, what I assume to be, the original Gnome desktop.
My computer is not particularly sophisticated being about 5 years old
and I would like to know whether I am likely to encounter a whole lot of
new problems to solve should I decide to upgrade. I have tried to follow
comments ma
On 3 July 2011 15:06, Norman Silverstone wrote:
>
>> I presume you mean well but I do not really understand what or
>> why you
>> are asking and I am not really sure if I care.
>>
>> Calm down, everybody... it really is not worth it.
>>
> I agree, I am just a cantankerous o
> I presume you mean well but I do not really understand what or
> why you
> are asking and I am not really sure if I care.
>
> Calm down, everybody... it really is not worth it.
>
I agree, I am just a cantankerous old man of 83 years who has been using
Ubuntu since the f
On 3 July 2011 12:32, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> < snip >
>
>> But you have been specifically answered & told how to install
>> Unity-2D! What do you want, someone to come and do it for you?
>
> Now, now, don't get your knickers in a twist.
>>
>> More generally: what spec of computer do you have?
On 3 July 2011 12:32, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I presume you mean well but I do not really understand what or why you
> are asking and I am not really sure if I care.
>
Calm down, everybody... it really is not worth it.
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
< snip >
> But you have been specifically answered & told how to install
> Unity-2D! What do you want, someone to come and do it for you?
Now, now, don't get your knickers in a twist.
>
> More generally: what spec of computer do you have? What is the make,
> model & memory capacity of its graphi
On 28 June 2011 13:16, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> My thanks to those who replied to my original questions. I shall just
> assume that my hardware is not suitable and be satisfied with GNOME.
But you have been specifically answered & told how to install
Unity-2D! What do you want, someone to come
My thanks to those who replied to my original questions. I shall just
assume that my hardware is not suitable and be satisfied with GNOME.
Norman
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:13 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 11.04 simply:-
> sudo apt-get install unity-2d And you'll get it.
Ah! Sorry, I thought you meant that 11.04 included it on the cd iso.
Thanks. 11.10 does include it, and video cards that won't work with 3d
work by default with 2d on boot
On 27 June 2011 18:06, Barry Drake wrote:
> Hadn't realised that. I'm running 11.04, and the login screen only
> offers me Ubuntu or Ubuntu Classic. 11.10 offers me Unity, Unity 2d and
> Gnome (though on the current testing download Gnome is not implemented.
>
On 11.04 simply:-
sudo apt-get in
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:05 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Unity 2D is available in 11.04 too.
Hadn't realised that. I'm running 11.04, and the login screen only
offers me Ubuntu or Ubuntu Classic. 11.10 offers me Unity, Unity 2d and
Gnome (though on the current testing download Gnome is not implemen
On 27/06/11 17:04, Barry Drake wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:07 +0100, Norman Silverstone wrote:
I have just completed the three stage upgrade process and now have
Ubuntu 11.04 in all its glory except that it appears that my desktop
will not run the latest layout and I am stuck with GNOME. Fur
On 27 June 2011 17:04, Barry Drake wrote:
> You might be interested to know that the testing version of Oneiric
> (11.10) now implements the 2d version of the Unity desktop, and will run
> on computers that cannot support Unity on 11.04. It is not finished,
> and may be a bit buggy, but it seems
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:07 +0100, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I have just completed the three stage upgrade process and now have
> Ubuntu 11.04 in all its glory except that it appears that my desktop
> will not run the latest layout and I am stuck with GNOME. Furthermore,
> the icon for adjusting
On 27 June 2011 15:07, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I have just completed the three stage upgrade process and now have
> Ubuntu 11.04 in all its glory except that it appears that my desktop
> will not run the latest layout and I am stuck with GNOME. Furthermore,
> the icon for adjusting the volume
On 27 June 2011 15:07, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I have just completed the three stage upgrade process and now have
> Ubuntu 11.04 in all its glory except that it appears that my desktop
> will not run the latest layout and I am stuck with GNOME. Furthermore,
> the icon for adjusting the volume
I have just completed the three stage upgrade process and now have
Ubuntu 11.04 in all its glory except that it appears that my desktop
will not run the latest layout and I am stuck with GNOME. Furthermore,
the icon for adjusting the volume of the sound is no longer there on the
top panel. I would
Hi Barry,
You're not by any fortunate chance in London, are you?
Can you give us an idea of your filesystem layout? i.e.:
/dev/sda1 is /boot
/dev/sda2 is /home
/dev/sda3 is /
or whatever? I am willing to bet you're not getting all the filesystems
mounted properly/in their proper place. For ins
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 20:48 +0100, Rob Beard wrote:
> On 17/10/10 17:34, Barry Titterton wrote:
> >
> > I finally found the time to try and fix this machine but I could not get
> > this to work when running from a LTS live CD: when running dpkg
> > virtually every line in the terminal had "permiss
On 17/10/10 17:34, Barry Titterton wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 12:51 +, Glen Mehn wrote:
>> Please please please file against update-manager.
>>
>> Rob: you can try this:
>> Boot from usb stick or live cd
>> Mount your filesystems in their correct places, so that your old / is at
>> /mounts
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 12:51 +, Glen Mehn wrote:
> Please please please file against update-manager.
>
> Rob: you can try this:
> Boot from usb stick or live cd
> Mount your filesystems in their correct places, so that your old / is at
> /mounts/oldroot
> Open a terminal
> Type 'chroot /mounts
On 15/10/10 21:02, Matthew Daubney wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:58 +0100, Rob Beard wrote:
>> On 12/10/10 15:11, Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>>> I did a fresh install on my Thinkpad X31 laptop, which went fine (but
>>> the netbook launcher is comprehensively broken on this hardware).
>>>
>>> You are
I did a fresh install the other night for a friend with a very old Acer
laptop, it installed ok but it is effectively Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop
without the Netbook launcher, I did get an error first time I logged on
but didnt take a note of it.
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:58 +0100, Rob Beard wrote:
> On
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:58 +0100, Rob Beard wrote:
> On 12/10/10 15:11, Liam Proven wrote:
>
> > I did a fresh install on my Thinkpad X31 laptop, which went fine (but
> > the netbook launcher is comprehensively broken on this hardware).
> >
> > You are really putting me off trying the upgrade on
On 12/10/10 15:11, Liam Proven wrote:
> I did a fresh install on my Thinkpad X31 laptop, which went fine (but
> the netbook launcher is comprehensively broken on this hardware).
>
> You are really putting me off trying the upgrade on my desktop - but
> then, I planned to leave it a few weeks for t
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:11 +0100, Liam Proven wrote:
> Um... I have to ask. You do know about how to switch between windows
> with Alt-Tab and Alt-Shift-Tab, don't you? And that you can drag any
> window from any point (not just the title bar) if you hold down the
> Alt key as you drag, so you ca
On 12/10/10 14:11, Liam Proven wrote:
> Um... I have to ask. You do know about how to switch between windows
> with Alt-Tab and Alt-Shift-Tab, don't you? And that you can drag any
> window from any point (not just the title bar) if you hold down the
> Alt key as you drag, so you can reposition a w
On 12 October 2010 14:16, ian pettitt wrote:
> On 12/10/10 14:11, Liam Proven wrote:
>> On 12 October 2010 07:13, Barry Titterton
>> wrote:
>>> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
>>> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
>>> which
>
> That wasn't an option for me - the whole program had hung and the mouse
> wasn't responding properly. I actually connected via ssh from my laptop
> to fix it, as I was working on that machine whilst the upgrade was
> taking place on the desktop.
>
Both machines I upgraded did exactly this. A r
On 12/10/10 14:11, Liam Proven wrote:
> On 12 October 2010 07:13, Barry Titterton
> wrote:
>> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
>> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
>> which appeared to be asking me what I wanted to do with my
On 12 October 2010 07:13, Barry Titterton
wrote:
> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
> which appeared to be asking me what I wanted to do with my modified
> version of GRUB2. This window was
hn skype: glenmehn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ian pettitt
> Sender: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:46:30
> To: UK Ubuntu Talk
> Reply-To: UK Ubuntu Talk
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Upgrade woes
>
> On 12/10/10 07:13, Barry Tittert
2010 09:46:30
To: UK Ubuntu Talk
Reply-To: UK Ubuntu Talk
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Upgrade woes
On 12/10/10 07:13, Barry Titterton wrote:
> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
> w
On 12/10/10 07:13, Barry Titterton wrote:
> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
> which appeared to be asking me what I wanted to do with my modified
> version of GRUB2. This window was position
I would always avoid GUI upgrades... use apt-get instead.
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On 12/10/10 07:13, Barry Titterton wrote:
> I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
> install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
> which appeared to be asking me what I wanted to do with my modified
> version of GRUB2. This window was position
I have just tried to upgrade my sickly install of 10.04 to 10.10. The
install process failed just after half way when it threw up a window
which appeared to be asking me what I wanted to do with my modified
version of GRUB2. This window was positioned behind the progress window,
and I could only se
Cornelius Mostert wrote:
> Hallo
>
> I have UBUNTU 8.10 installed and and SAMBA 3.2.3 and would like to
> know how to upgrade SAMBA to lets say 3.3.7 (This is what is working
> for Win 7: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7)
> I have downloaded 3.3.7 from: http://samba.org/samba/ftp/old-vers
Hallo
I have UBUNTU 8.10 installed and and SAMBA 3.2.3 and would like to know how
to upgrade SAMBA to lets say 3.3.7 (This is what is working for Win 7:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7)
I have downloaded 3.3.7 from: http://samba.org/samba/ftp/old-versions/
And from the Docs: samba-3.3.7/d
Cheers for that -- I went in to recovery mode (didn't even know it existed!)
and saw an option to automatically fix graphics problems there, so selected
it, and here I am, back in Ubuntu!
There are a few other teething problems I'm having that I shall probably be
posting here once I've failed to fi
Or live cd?
Yay i'm thinking of solutions for ubuntu peeps now!
James
On 30 May 2009, at 22:59, Saikiran Madugula
wrote:
> doug livesey wrote:
>> So I can't even go in & delete the file that skips the blacklisted
>> drivers for compiz.
>> Can anyone advise me as to how I can get back to a wo
doug livesey wrote:
> So I can't even go in & delete the file that skips the blacklisted
> drivers for compiz.
> Can anyone advise me as to how I can get back to a working system?
> I'm rather desperate, as my main dev environment is Ubuntu, and I
> sort-of need it to do some work!
> Cheers,
>D
Hi -- so I finally bit the bullet & upgraded to 9.04 on my Macbook 3,1.When
will I learn? If it ain't broke ...
When I did, it all seemed to go well, but I couldn't enable the desktop
effects I had in Ibex, so I googled the problem, & found lots of
instructions on how to skip the blacklisting of th
2009/5/13 Dean Sas :
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:29, Liam Proven wrote:
>> 2009/5/12 Alan Pope :
>>> 2009/5/12 Liam Proven :
The key thing is to keep your /home directory tree on a separate
partition. That makes re-installing much less painful and fiddly.
>>>
>>> Not really. You ca
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:29, Liam Proven wrote:
> 2009/5/12 Alan Pope :
>> 2009/5/12 Liam Proven :
>>> The key thing is to keep your /home directory tree on a separate
>>> partition. That makes re-installing much less painful and fiddly.
>>>
>>
>> Not really. You can reinstall over the top these
2009/5/12 Alan Pope :
> 2009/5/12 Liam Proven :
>> The key thing is to keep your /home directory tree on a separate
>> partition. That makes re-installing much less painful and fiddly.
>>
>
> Not really. You can reinstall over the top these days and it will wipe
> everything except /home - even if
2009/5/12 Tony Pursell :
> Hi all
>
> I have upgraded all the way from Warty to Jaunty with no problems
> due to the upgrade process going wrong.
>
> Cheers
> Tony
*Boggle*
Wow! Well, I'm impressed!
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail
Hi all
I have upgraded all the way from Warty to Jaunty with no problems
due to the upgrade process going wrong.
Cheers
Tony
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
2009/5/12 Liam Proven :
> The key thing is to keep your /home directory tree on a separate
> partition. That makes re-installing much less painful and fiddly.
>
Not really. You can reinstall over the top these days and it will wipe
everything except /home - even if it's all on one partition. This
2009/5/12 Lucy :
> 2009/5/12 Robert Longstaff :
>>> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
>>> think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
>>> than to run the upgrade?
>>
>> I'm personally an 'install from fresh' person, but that's
>>
I'm not very good with upgrades and things, so I was really pleased when
I upgraded using the upgrade tool, to find that it worked perfectly too.
I was kind of dreading it, with my past experience with messing things
up, but I was very impressed.
John.
jim.came...@buhlersortex.com wrote:
> Luc
Lucy :
> The upgrade I just did downloaded over a gig worth of data,
> but as I'm on a fast connection the entire install was
> complete in about 30-40 minutes. If I was on a slower
> connection I would probably have been better off using a cd
> instead. On the other hand, f I had less installed on
Well, then I stand corrected! ;)
When I installed Ibex on my Macbook, there was loads of buggering around in
the config files to get things like the touchpad scrolling working, and
loads of sound issues, and other things which I don't recall just to hand.
Which is fair enough, as there's a hell of
2009/5/12 Robert Longstaff :
>> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
>> think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
>> than to run the upgrade?
>
> I'm personally an 'install from fresh' person, but that's
> just me ;)
>
> Otherwise
> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
> think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
> than to run the upgrade?
I'm personally an 'install from fresh' person, but that's
just me ;)
Otherwise, I heard two anecdotal stories at a rec
2009/5/12 Alan Pope :
> 2009/5/12 doug livesey :
>> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
>> think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
>> than to run the upgrade?
>
> What makes you think they do?
>
> Perhaps these people are used
I wouldn't say that upgrading is unreliable in Windows - a clean
install is always a better option, and technically safer, but
upgrading is also quite reliable.
James
On 12 May 2009, at 11:53, Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/5/12 doug livesey :
>> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the comm
doug livesey wrote:
> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large
> seems to think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of
> Ubuntu rather than to run the upgrade?
> Cheers,
>Doug.
personally I think the install process is such a pleasure to use it
would be
2009/5/12 doug livesey :
> Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
> think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
> than to run the upgrade?
What makes you think they do?
Perhaps these people are used to Windows/Fedora/Red Hat where
u
Hi -- I was just wondering, why it is that the community-at-large seems to
think that it is better to reinstall to a newer version of Ubuntu rather
than to run the upgrade?
Cheers,
Doug.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Greenwood wrote:
...
> If you use the -O (minus sign then capital 'oh', not zero) on the wget
> command, you can give it the name of the file to write out. That
> simplifies the following line:
>
>
>> sudo mv pastebin.php\?dl\=f3944dadb /etc/apt
2009/4/27 Harry Rickards :
>
> There's a couple of other changes you might need to make, so I've put an
> updated source.list for you at http://pastebin.com/f3944dadb. To replace
> your current one with the updated one, just do the following in a terminal:
>
> cd
> sudo cp /etc/apt/sources.list /et
2009/4/27 Harry Rickards :
>
> Sorry, I've just re-read your original email. It seems you were using
> update-manager.
>
> Open up your source.list
>
> sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list
>
It's better if you use 'gksu' or 'gksudo' instead of 'sudo' for a
graphical program, especially if you'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
Harry Rickards wrote:
John Taylor wrote:
>>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> John Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ala
Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>
>
Alan Pope wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Rickards wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Are you trying to install from a Jaunty CD, or via the internet? If via
>>> the internet, try changing the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>
Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/4/26 John T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
Harry Rickards wrote:
John Taylor wrote:
>>> Alan Pope wrote:
>>>
>>>
2009/4/26 John Taylor :
Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
> Alan Pope wrote:
>
>
>> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>
>
>> Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
>>
>> any ide
Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>> Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>>>
>>>
Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
any ideas? never happened before!
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Alan Pope wrote:
>> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>>
>>> Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
>>>
>>> any ideas? never happened before!
>>>
>>>
>> How did you try to upgrade?
>> Can you attac
Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>
>> Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
>>
>> any ideas? never happened before!
>>
>>
>
> How did you try to upgrade?
> Can you attach your /etc/apt/sources.list and the contents of any
> files in /etc/apt/so
2009/4/26 John Taylor :
> Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
>
> any ideas? never happened before!
>
How did you try to upgrade?
Can you attach your /etc/apt/sources.list and the contents of any
files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@l
Seems to fail during calculating changes - could not calculate upgrade
any ideas? never happened before!
John
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Morning all,
On 11/03/2008, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The error messages that you get before being dropped in to the shell
> would help us to diagnose the problem and try and fix it. Can you
> transcribe at least the last few lines in to an email?
>
I'm not getting any error m
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 20:45 +, Stephen Garton wrote:
> Evening all,
>
> I wanted to help log bugs etc in Hardy, but have hit a bit of a snag-
> I can't do anything apart from boot into recovery mode from grub! If I
> choose(or let grub choose) the default kernel, I get nothing.
>
> I can manu
Stephen Garton wrote:
> Evening all,
>
> I wanted to help log bugs etc in Hardy, but have hit a bit of a snag-
> I can't do anything apart from boot into recovery mode from grub! If I
> choose(or let grub choose) the default kernel, I get nothing.
>
> I can manually start up eth0 from the recover
Evening all,
I wanted to help log bugs etc in Hardy, but have hit a bit of a snag-
I can't do anything apart from boot into recovery mode from grub! If I
choose(or let grub choose) the default kernel, I get nothing.
I can manually start up eth0 from the recovery console, is there any
way I can do
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:44 +, STONE COLD wrote:
> Will Synaptic be able to configure my partitions like i currently have
> them! ?
>
> Pros and cons?which one?
>
Technically you can't "upgrade" using the live CD. You can re-install
over the top which will lose all your current applic
just wondering which would be better!
Will Synaptic be able to configure my partitions like i currently have them! ?
Pros and cons?which one?
Javad--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 08:22 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
>
> baz wrote:
>
>
>
> Any idea why NVU is not in the repositories for Feisty?
>
>
It's been dropped from the repositories as it is "Umaintained by
upstream."[1]
It hasn't been updated since 28-06-2005 however there is an unofficial
bug-
baz wrote:
> Thanks that seemed to go ok, only lost Nvu, which I've now installed
> from their site.
Any idea why NVU is not in the repositories for Feisty?
Regards,
Tony.
--
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, M
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 19:40 +0100, Kris Marsh wrote:
> On 4/17/07, baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, what's the best way to upgrade? I'm running Edgy at the mo.
> >
> > Baz
>
> Hi Baz,
>
> Here is the method I used, around a month ago. I'm sure the upgrade
> will be fine for you, but the usu
Stating the obvious, I know, but just a word of warning: I've had
updates to a new release fail miserably, so be sure to back up your data
beforehand in case the short cut turns out to be anything but.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki
> I got this by typing update-manager --help in a terminal:
>
> Usage: update-manager [options]
Thanks Eamonn - I guess I should have thought of that :-P !!
Chris
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
