Quick update - I've just had a look at the source that Joomla throws
out - the admin menu's javascript in a table, yuk! Drupal source on
the other hand is beautiful (well, could do with blank lines and
indents, but hey that doesn't affect how it's parsed!
--
ubuntu-uk mailing list
ubuntu-uk@list
On 05/07/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joomla is a fork of Mambo. The original developer team got fed up with
Mambo trying to scam money out of users and developers that they all jumped
ship together and have been working on Joomla for ages.
Ah, I knew there was a fork, but didn't know
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 13:46 +0100, Lee Tambiah wrote:
> >Has anyone got any advice on the pros and cons of Mambo, Joomla and
> >Drupal? I need to pick one!
>
> There is no right answer for this. I have looked and tried many of the open
> source ones in question. Choosing a content managemnt syst
>Has anyone got any advice on the pros and cons of Mambo, Joomla and
>Drupal? I need to pick one!
There is no right answer for this. I have looked and tried many of the open
source ones in question. Choosing a content managemnt system is determined by
what you require your web site to be. For e
