-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/01/15 19:25, oli_kester wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:17:05 + From: Barry Titterton
>> To: "Talk, UK"
>> Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Is the new UK
>> Computing GCSE any better for FOSS? Message-ID:
>> <54bfdf11.8070...@gmail.com> Content-T
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:17:05 +
> From: Barry Titterton
> To: "Talk, UK"
> Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Is the new UK Computing GCSE any better for FOSS?
> Message-ID: <54bfdf11.8070...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi All,
>
> Do any
On 27 January 2015 at 17:24, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 27/01/15 17:14, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> I might suggest that high horses are out of order when complaining about
>> problems in an alpha release :) Colin
>
>
> Oops! I hadn't realised I was giving that impression. Apologies to anyone
> for my o
On 27/01/15 17:14, Colin Law wrote:
I might suggest that high horses are out of order when complaining
about problems in an alpha release :) Colin
Oops! I hadn't realised I was giving that impression. Apologies to
anyone for my own misunderstanding. :(
Regards,Barry.
--
ubuntu-
On 27 January 2015 at 15:51, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 27/01/15 14:54, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> In the working mint and the non-working ubuntu what do apt-cache policy
>> wine and apt-cache policy wine1.6 and which msiexec show? Colin
>
>
> I think you've got it Colin. The packages appeared to be the
On 27/01/15 14:54, Colin Law wrote:
In the working mint and the non-working ubuntu what do apt-cache
policy wine and apt-cache policy wine1.6 and which msiexec show? Colin
I think you've got it Colin. The packages appeared to be the same, I
hadn't spotted the '4' and the '6' after 'ubuntu' i
On 27 January 2015 at 13:47, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 27/01/15 12:42, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
>>
>> you mentioned earlier in the thread that you successfully ran the
>> installation on an copy of mint using the same ubuntu packages. Was that
>> possibly using a different .wine directory? Have you t
On 27/01/15 12:42, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
you mentioned earlier in the thread that you successfully ran the
installation on an copy of mint using the same ubuntu packages. Was
that possibly using a different .wine directory? Have you tried
against an entirely virgin .wine directory
Tried eve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/01/2015 12:20, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 27/01/15 11:53, Colin Law wrote:
>> I see from the bug report that you have used the command wine
>> msiexec -i ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi What happens if
>> you just use msiexec -i ActivePython-2
On 27 January 2015 at 12:20, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 27/01/15 11:53, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> I see from the bug report that you have used the command wine msiexec -i
>> ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi What happens if you just use msiexec -i
>> ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi Colin
>
> Exact
On 27/01/15 11:53, Colin Law wrote:
I see from the bug report that you have used the command wine msiexec
-i ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi What happens if you just use
msiexec -i ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi Colin
Exactly the same happens. I think msiexec is becoming obsolete now.
On 27 January 2015 at 11:45, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 20/01/15 10:50, Barry Drake wrote:
>>
>> Hi there Some time ago, I mentioned that I could not install .msi
>> files using wine.
>
>
> I've reported this as a wine bug at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414995
>
> Please, please would som
On 20/01/15 10:50, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there Some time ago, I mentioned that I could not install
.msi files using wine.
I've reported this as a wine bug at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414995
Please, please would somebody take five minutes to repeat and confirm
this bug. If you
13 matches
Mail list logo
