On 27 January 2015 at 15:51, Barry Drake <ubuntu-advertis...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 27/01/15 14:54, Colin Law wrote: >> >> In the working mint and the non-working ubuntu what do apt-cache policy >> wine and apt-cache policy wine1.6 and which msiexec show? Colin > > > I think you've got it Colin. The packages appeared to be the same, I hadn't > spotted the '4' and the '6' after 'ubuntu' in the name. This is what I get > from the above: > > barry@mint ~ $ apt-cache policy wine > wine: > Installed: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 > Candidate: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 > Version table: > *** 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 0 > 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > barry@mint ~ $ apt-cache policy wine1.6 > wine1.6: > Installed: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 > Candidate: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 > Version table: > *** 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu4 0 > 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > barry@mint ~ $ which msiexec > /usr/bin/msiexec > > barry@vivid:~$ apt-cache policy wine > wine: > Installed: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu6 > Candidate: 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu6 > Version table: > *** 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu6 0 > 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ vivid/universe amd64
Also it seems you are using Ubuntu 15.10 which is still in alpha (not even in beta), and is exactly the version in the bug report. There seems little doubt that you are seeing that bug. You should probably mark yours as a duplicate to save someone else that effort. I might suggest that high horses are out of order when complaining about problems in an alpha release :) Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
