Hi
On 29/10/06, John Rodgers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe from a list
Depends on the list.
One technique is to select to view all the headers for any message
received from the list.
You should see many headers starting with List, one should be
unsubscribe, either go to the UR
Although overall I thought the organisation prior to and during the
LinuxWorld Expo last week was very good indeed, with most requirements
covered, I wonder if we should document any lessons collectively learnt,
things that went well and things that didn't go so well?
To start the ball rolling:
go to the webpage:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
if you want to unsub from this list.
tim
John Rodgers wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe from a list
>
> --
> +==+
> John Rodgers MISTC
> St Neots
> Cambridgeshire
How do I unsubscribe from a list
--
+==+
John Rodgers MISTC
St Neots
Cambridgeshire, UK
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+==+
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
I'll check the notes tommorow when im back in the other office but from
memory istanbul and xvidcap were mentioned in dispatches
Nik
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:23:11PM +, Tony Arnold wrote:
> Can someone remind me of the two screencast packages that were mentioned
> at our meeting last week?
>
There's quite a few
Istanbul, recordmydesktop, xvidcap, screenkast, ffmpeg, gstreamer,
demorecorder, vncrec, vnc2swf.
I've used t
Can someone remind me of the two screencast packages that were mentioned
at our meeting last week?
Thanks.
Regards,
Tony.
--
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.
T: +44 (0)161 275 6093, F: +44 (0)
tim matthews wrote:
> here's an interesting link from Slashdot ...
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/28/239258
>
> meaning that something has gone wrong with updating from dapper to edgy.
>
> or not true? your experiences?
>
> I'm hoping to do that update on the workstation later o
There was a problem in xubuntu but that seemed to resolve itself. But
it seems that some people are having the trouble all the same. I
believe that part of the issue is the cd line in /etc/apt/sources.list
--
Seek That Thy Might Know
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:56:00PM +, tim matthews wrote:
> meaning that something has gone wrong with updating from dapper to edgy.
> or not true? your experiences?
>
Must be true for some people I'm sure. The people who have successfully
upgraded to edgy with few or no problems are not like
As a new Lug master I wouldn't recommend pushing any one Linux Distro,
that removes one of Linux's biggest assets choice. However I'm sure
that it would be nice to have Ubuntu personnel come out and talk about
general Ubuntu/Linux innovations. However I feel it would be wrong
(even though most o
here's an interesting link from Slashdot ...
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/28/239258
meaning that something has gone wrong with updating from dapper to edgy.
or not true? your experiences?
I'm hoping to do that update on the workstation later on next month ...
t.
--
ubuntu-
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 11:19 +, alan c wrote:
> LUGs will do what they want, usually distro neutral. They do not owe
> much, if anything to Ubuntu. I am in two adopted LUGs, and Ubuntu. For
> advocacy one LUG is highly active, the other not. If either LUG wanted
> Ubuntu resource I would be keen
Jono Bacon wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 22:49 +0100, Nicholas Butler wrote:
>> > In return the LUGs (or at least I'm going from my experience with
>> > MANLUG) would love to see Ubuntu oriented material flowing their way in
>> > the form of speakers at meetings etc.
>> >
>> Thats BANG ON what
Alan Pope wrote:
> many of them are quite active whether we (Ubuntu-*) are there or not. We
> (Ubuntu-*) need to be careful not to "take over", "muscle in", or in any way
> make them feel that they have to use Ubuntu whilst at the same time help to
> invigorate and stimulate growth in those LUGs.
>
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:10:02AM +, Tony Arnold wrote:
> My own LUG is very active and doesn't need any invigoration, but they
> would welcome Ubuntu related activities at some of their meetings. I'm
> sure there are members there who would reciprocate and help out with
> Ubuntu-UK activiti
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:17:45AM +, Jono Bacon wrote:
> In my mind, I believe LUGs offer a strong structure for general Linux
> discussion, support and community growth, but Ubuntu UK is here to help
> advocate and grow the Ubuntu community.
I totally agree. LUGs are there for any Linux use
Nik,
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 08:58 +, Nicholas Butler wrote:
> Speaking of LUGS though I feel there is much that could be done to
> invigorate and support that community, and despite all the possible
> negative connotations I believe that its a conversation to be had but
> not here on Ubuntu
Alan,
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 08:42 +, Alan Pope wrote:
> Agreed. Whilst I am of the opinion that many LUGs in the UK could
> really do with some invigoration, we (Ubuntu-*) need to be careful not to
> over-do the Ubuntu side of things. LUGs pre-date Ubuntu and Ubuntu-UK by
> some considerable
19 matches
Mail list logo
