Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: logwatch
It seems named logging changed a little bit; enough to confuse some
existing logwatch named filters. I have fixed this for some recurring
rules on my machine. I will attach the output of diff:
diff -ruN /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/named
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48923963/Dependencies.txt
--
missing named filter/service patterns
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584229
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in
** Patch added: "output of "diff -ruN
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/named /etc
/logwatch/scripts/services/named""
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48924437/logwatch.diff
--
missing named filter/service patterns
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584229
You received this bug notification be
The patch fixes the bug.
--
missing named filter/service patterns
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584229
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubun
My bug 509734 was marked as a duplicate of this one. This was a special
case using the atd job scheduler. At jobs launched by ldap users worked,
but at jobs launched by root did *not* work. atd was doing a group
lookup, and nss was dropping privileges, thus breaking root-launched at
jobs. To work a
Back with more information:
After running for "a while" with at jobs being successfully executed,
atd will start giving errors as described above. I have not yet managed
to discover the maximum amount of time between an atd restart and a
successful atd job execution.
--
initgroups() fails when u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mailman
The logrotate.d script that comes with mailman sends root the message
"Re-opening all log files" every time it runs
"/usr/lib/mailman/bin/mailmanctl reopen". This is only informational,
and does not point to any problems. Thus, it should probably
