Bug was rasied on 2008-04-04 and has 14 duplicates, yet this is somehow invalid?
I don't even use Ubuntu anymore because of silly issues like this.
What do we need to do to get action on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribe
@Clint Byrum
How about we fix the bug for the next release instead of marking it as invalid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
Title:
Network is brought down befor
Advice: stop wasting time on ubuntu bugs. Nothing is done about them. I
moved away from Ubuntu years ago because of this fact and every now and
then major bugs like this are updated with a new comment and nothing is
ever done. If you want politics and bugs, use ubuntu; if not move to a
distro that
Let the inboxes be filled until it is committed!
--
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
@bopb
I'm not sure that your closing point has much relevence to completing this bug.
It merely suggests you accept the mediocrity of the situation. Of course the
situation could be much worse than this, thats just stating the obvious. This
does not mean its acceptable.
Oh and there are many oth
@wolfi...@gmail.com
I agree of course. You just described the Ubuntu project!
The thing is people solve Launchpad Ubuntu bugs all the time. The problem is
the managers of the distro. The other problem is how hard it is to get a fix
committed.
This is not the only example of where I have done the
Ubuntu - too many indians, no chiefs. Oh there are chiefs but they must
be too busy smoking crack.
--
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subs
@Max-Ulrich Farber
What Mathias Gug was suggesting may be a better solution however not the
current method that Ubuntu employs in its [shutdown] scripts.
Considering how hard it is to get the other fixes committed as a
solution (which do work, I have tested and so have others), I would
assume this
@Max-Ulrich Farber
I disagree and I don't think you can speak for others like that.
Considering the Linux kernel and Samba itself are shared between
hundreds of Linux distributions and that Samba is basically the same (in
this context) on other operating systems such as FreeBSD etc., it is
clear t
I think the problem lies with the lack of action on behalf of people with power
to commit fixes such as Canonical sponsors.
I gave up on Ubuntu's management a long time ago. Where are the chiefs?
--
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21163
@Reinhard Tartler:
If you actually spent some time reading the bug and its related duplicates etc.
you wouldn't need to ask that question.
--
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Yeah I would have to say that response with things in Ubuntu is pathetic.
A lot of the time its hard to get something fixed for the next release let
alone in the current release where it should be fixed.
Its the good old 'have to upgrade to the next release to fix this problem, and
then i get fre
Please fix this perpetuating bug, there are quite a few solutions noted,
the simplest being http://whereofwecannotspeak.wordpress.com/2007/12/25
/unmount-samba-filesystems-before-shutdown-or-reboot/
I believe there are also duplicate bugs.
--
CIFS/SMBFS issue (was not resolved on #207441)
https:
13 matches
Mail list logo
