Yikes! Yes, my mistake. I was assuming Phil was looking at the March
11th iso's, not the March 1st iso's.. That timing...
Nicholas
On 03/12/2012 02:18 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:08:14PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>> In addition, I don't believe the period in the date
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:08:14PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> In addition, I don't believe the period in the date is intentional --
> someone correct me if I'm wrong here :-)
>
> IE, 20120301.1 should actually be 201203011
No, if the daily image gets respun, the date gets a .N suffix appende
On 03/12/2012 06:55 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi Phill,
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/208/builds/12811/downloads from
the iso tracker is reporting a 404.
If you mean the download links from this page reports a 404, it's
because the tracker points to images on cdima
In addition, I don't believe the period in the date is intentional --
someone correct me if I'm wrong here :-)
IE, 20120301.1 should actually be 201203011
Nicholas
On 03/12/2012 01:55 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/208/builds/12811/downloa