Yikes! Yes, my mistake. I was assuming Phil was looking at the March 11th iso's, not the March 1st iso's.. That timing...
Nicholas On 03/12/2012 02:18 PM, Steve Beattie wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:08:14PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: >> In addition, I don't believe the period in the date is intentional -- >> someone correct me if I'm wrong here :-) >> >> IE, 20120301.1 should actually be 201203011 > No, if the daily image gets respun, the date gets a .N suffix appended > to it; .1 is the first respin, .2 is the second. > > >
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
