Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: >>> With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something >>> has failed to run the cellular stuff entirely, perhaps failing to >>> initialise the gsm mode

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Fabian Herb wrote: > > On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: > >>> With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something > >>> has failed to run the cellu

[Ubuntu-phone] No Signal on Nexus 5 after flashing #79

Hi, My nexus 5 does not seem to catch any carrier signal after flashing the latest image #79. wifi works fine. Anyone facing a similar problem? Tried flashing this image using multirom manager from Google play store. Regards, Sayantan Das -- Use Linux. Be free !

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

Am 13.06.2014 10:03, schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Fabian Herb > wrote: On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani mailto:ricca...@rpadovani.com>> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Be

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] No Signal on Nexus 5 after flashing #79

hi, Am Freitag, den 13.06.2014, 14:12 +0530 schrieb Sayantan Das: > Hi, > > > My nexus 5 does not seem to catch any carrier signal after flashing > the latest image #79. wifi works fine. > Anyone facing a similar problem? > yes, see the "Cellular Fail" thread ... ciao oli signature.

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Server Scopes and Push notifications update Jun 12, 2014

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Thomas Voß wrote: > From the push notification service perspective, the incoming message > is not descriptive enough to automatically map the incoming message to > one of the visual cues. For that to happen, we need assistance from > the app to translate between th

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Bull wrote on 07/06/14 22:57: > ... > > So, in my house I have really bad signal, so it looked normal that > the network indicator showed the 0 bars icon, for a really weak > signal. But, when I tried to send a text message, it became > apparen

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Server Scopes and Push notifications update Jun 12, 2014

On 13 June 2014 13:50, Alejandro J. Cura wrote: > Still, this looks like giving much too flexibility on what to show and > how to annoy the user (sound, haptic feedback!) to apps we don't > trust. > Do we have clear use cases for this added flexibility? the helper receives the push message and, b

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

On ven, 2014-06-13 at 13:52 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > You're right, this is a mistake in the design. Just showing zero bars > is not enough to indicate that you have no signal, regardless of what > the cause is. Yep, but 0 bars is actually used to indicate that you DO have a signal under

[Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

Hello all, I'm currently in the process of building proper phone langpacks, so that we can stop using the desktop ones (which are way too large, and don't fit well) [1]. For this to make complete sense, we should move the 14 source packages which have translations, are shipped on the touch image,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Server Scopes and Push notifications update Jun 12, 2014

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:05 AM, John Lenton wrote: > On 13 June 2014 13:50, Alejandro J. Cura wrote: >> Still, this looks like giving much too flexibility on what to show and >> how to annoy the user (sound, haptic feedback!) to apps we don't >> trust. >> Do we have clear use cases for this add

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

On 06/13/2014 08:52 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Bull wrote on 07/06/14 22:57: ... So, in my house I have really bad signal, so it looked normal that the network indicator showed the 0 bars icon, for a really weak signal. But, when I tried to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] split greeter revert

Just a heads up, this landed in image 81! -mt On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > Hi all, > A couple of weeks ago we landed what we refer to as the "split greeter". > "Split greeter" was in effect removing or "splitting" out the greeter from > the unity8 shell process and into

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Calling for Click signing

If we "auto sign" those packages and then later developer decides to update app and sign it with own key, what happened then? Update should them fail right? Are we planning to have policy in places allowing apps to share package only if they have same signature? If two different apps are coming f

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Calling for Click signing

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ondrej Kubik wrote: > If we "auto sign" those packages and then later developer decides to update > app and sign it with own key, what happened then? Update should them fail > right? All the client cares about is that our signature is valid. It doesn't matter wha

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Calling for Click signing

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ondrej Kubik > wrote: > > If we "auto sign" those packages and then later developer decides to > update > > app and sign it with own key, what happened then? Update should them fail > > right? > > All th

[Ubuntu-phone] Unity API status update

Scopes As we don't want to break scopes ABI frequently we decided to batch those changes to make scopes developers' live a little bit easier. However, that also means that we haven't really landing bigger new feature on the device for last couple of weeks. That will change next week by introducing

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] split greeter revert

After update to image #81 "answer the call" button doesn't show up. I can only hear the ringtone. /sebastian 2014-06-13 16:20 GMT+02:00 Michael Terry : > Just a heads up, this landed in image 81! > -mt > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Kevin Gunn > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> A couple of wee

[Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.3 landing update June 13

Good progress again. Looking at last week's actions: camera works in addition to video playback, automated autopilot testing is now functional, bugs for autopilot tests have been filed, store apps seem quite fine initially, qtbase failing unit tests have been investigated a bit, packaging and syncs

[Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 13.06.14

.com/smokeng/utopic/touch/mako/80:20140613:20140530/8547/ * Some useful documentation: (Still under development) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/ComponentSupportList https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/LandingTeam https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/FAQ * Known issues: ** Pictures taken with flash ar

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

Hi Martin, On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > […] > Due to the CI train I can't just upload these or stage these in > lp:, but we need MPs and verification, etc. As this won't > change anything at runtime it hardly makes sense to go through all > this fuss just for this

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Calling for Click signing

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 15:48 +0100, Ondrej Kubik wrote: > If two different apps are coming from same developer and share same > package name ( and same signature) will they share same sandbox or > will they be able to peak into each other's sandbox, at least data > wise? The only ways currently f

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] split greeter revert

after reboot it works properly /sebastian 2014-06-13 18:43 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Gomułka : > After update to image #81 "answer the call" button doesn't show up. I can > only hear the ringtone. > > /sebastian > > > 2014-06-13 16:20 GMT+02:00 Michael Terry : > > Just a heads up, this landed in ima

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Calling for Click signing

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Ondrej Kubik wrote: >> >> All the client cares about is that our signature is valid. It doesn't >> matter what the developer does. Devices will not check developer's >> signatures. We can make sure our servers are aware of the transition >> and handle it appropria

[Ubuntu-phone] Plugging the holes in /dev/binder and audio/video playback/recording

In prioritizing and preparing for RTM, an irc discussion happened today surrounding audio/video playback/recording and I was asked to send something to the list so everyone is on the same page. Background: App store apps are considered untrusted and it is our mission to make sure that Ubuntu phon

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 17:56 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > […] > > Due to the CI train I can't just upload these or stage these in > > lp:, but we need MPs and verification, etc. As this won't > > change anything at runtime

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:08:56PM -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 17:56 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > […] > > > Due to the CI train I can't just upload these or stage these in > > > lp:, but we

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Plugging the holes in /dev/binder and audio/video playback/recording

On 06/13/2014 02:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: ... > "Untrusted by the OS: AppStore apps run in a restricted sandbox as defined in > Application Confinement. Reviews of apps can be shallow, but as a result > AppStore apps are considered untrusted. Untrusted applications: > > can freely access

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 21:15 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > These are one line additions to debian/control. They are rebuilds. Maybe for all the packages that isn't an issue, but for C++, it means that anything that provides a template the code uses, and which has changed since the last build, has the p

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

Hi Rodney, On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:45:49PM -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 21:15 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > > These are one line additions to debian/control. > They are rebuilds. Maybe for all the packages that isn't an issue, but > for C++, it means that anything that provid

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Simple mass-change: Mark universe packages for langpacks, please include in your next MP

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 14:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I think in that case, we do want changes from the archive to be landed > directly to the upstream branches in question, which I believe is already at > least somewhat automated. Could you expand on your concern regarding "wrong > versions