On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:05 AM, John Lenton <john.len...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 13 June 2014 13:50, Alejandro J. Cura <alejandro.c...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Still, this looks like giving much too flexibility on what to show and >> how to annoy the user (sound, haptic feedback!) to apps we don't >> trust. >> Do we have clear use cases for this added flexibility? > > the helper receives the push message and, based on that, requests a > notification be presented to the user (or not). Whether we do or not > is based on policy (via the notification settings) and such. The > helper doesn't do the presenting.
Yes, that's very clear in Thomas' explanation. But I still don't understand what problem the added complexity is solving. What I was asking for is if we have use cases like: "Bob wants to get a sound for mail in his Inbox folder, but wants haptic for Spam" (ted is telling me a few on irc; I think I'm happy now) cheers, -- alecu -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
