On 15 December 2013 12:26, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> On 12/13/2013 07:58 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to
>> cross-compile CMake based projects:
>>
>> One time setup:
>> $ mk-sbuild --target armhf trusty
>>
>> Building a
On 15 December 2013 12:29, Michał Sawicz wrote:
> On 15.12.2013 13:26, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>>
>> I'm interested in having the same support in qmake; is someone already
>> working on it?
>> What do your changes do, exactly? Do I understand correctly that the
>> goal is to have the build system
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 15 December 2013 12:26, Alberto Mardegan
> wrote:
> > Hi Dimitri,
> >
> > On 12/13/2013 07:58 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >> As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to
> >> cross-compile CMake based projects:
On 13-12-16 07:07 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
> Are you implying there are canonical projects not using CMake yet?
>
>
> There are, yes. Off the top of my head:
> - ubuntu-ui-toolkit
> - oxide (not in the archive yet)
>
> There might be more.
>
I've added a work item to switch oxide to CMa
Dimitri,
Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML
extension I'd like to ship as a binary in a .click package (and not
necessarily build a .deb package), could I use this as well? And if so, how?
Thanks!
Cheers,
David.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Marc Deslau
Hi,
We have an upcoming (in the new year) Qt transition to 5.2 on the
platform. At that point we'll start building system and core apps
against Qt 5.2 which will mean they won't work on older images which
aren't 5.2 based.
We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
in t
On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote:
> Dimitri,
>
> Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML
> extension I'd like to ship as a binary in a .click package (and not
> necessarily build a .deb package), could I use this as well? And if so, how?
>
Yes, you
On 16 December 2013 12:07, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
>
> There are, yes. Off the top of my head:
> - ubuntu-ui-toolkit
> - oxide (not in the archive yet)
>
> There might be more.
About ubuntu-ui-toolkit. Is it something that should be maintained at
qt upstream as a platform module? (if that at all
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>
>
> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10
> defined as the framework in the manifest.json. Related, as I
> understand it we have a plan to swi
IIRC (I'd have to look at the code) yes, we do send the SDK version (and if
we didn't, then we only need to add it before the switch happens).
This opens the door for devs to upload multiple versions with slightly
different names supporting different SDKs, which sucks.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Roberto Alsina
wrote:
> This opens the door for devs to upload multiple versions with slightly
> different names supporting different SDKs, which sucks.
And why do you think this doesn't happen in Android or iOS?
--
Martin
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.
Well, on iOS people just support the latest because it has ~80% device
coverage in weeks. If we can do that, then it will not happen here.
As for Android ... well, I have no idea. But plenty of apps don't work on
plenty of devices after a specific app version, and there is no way to get
the old ver
On 13-12-16 08:27 AM, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>
>> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
>> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10
>> defined as the framework in the manifest.json
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Roberto Alsina
wrote:
> Well, on iOS people just support the latest because it has ~80% device
> coverage in weeks. If we can do that, then it will not happen here.
Yes, this is the plan.
> As for Android ... well, I have no idea. But plenty of apps don't work
On 16/12/13 13:48, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Roberto Alsina
> wrote:
>> Well, on iOS people just support the latest because it has ~80% device
>> coverage in weeks. If we can do that, then it will not happen here.
>
> Yes, this is the plan.
Apple stopped executi
On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>
>> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
>> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10
>> defined as the framework in the manifes
On 12/16/2013 01:56 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> 1) Simply because qmake encodes and assumes the same "host"
> configration options as were used when qmake & qmake modules were
> created. To properly support multiarch, all qmake modules instlalation
> path will need to transition from non-multi
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> On 12/16/2013 01:56 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> 1) Simply because qmake encodes and assumes the same "host"
>> configration options as were used when qmake & qmake modules were
>> created. To properly support multiarch, all qmake mod
On 16.12.2013 14:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote:
>> Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML
>> extension I'd like to ship as a binary in a .click package (and not
>> necessarily build a .deb package), could I use th
On 16 December 2013 14:06, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> On 12/16/2013 01:56 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> 1) Simply because qmake encodes and assumes the same "host"
>> configration options as were used when qmake & qmake modules were
>> created. To properly support multiarch, all qmake modules i
On 16 December 2013 14:51, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> On 16.12.2013 14:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote:
>>> Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML
>>> extension I'd like to ship as a binary in a .click package (and n
Hello,
On 16.12.2013 15:57, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 14:51, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> On 16.12.2013 14:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote:
Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML
ext
On 12/16/2013 07:27 AM, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>
>>
>> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
>> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10
>> defined as the framework in the manifest.js
On 16 December 2013 15:10, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>>
>> I think you want:
>>
>> click chroot -a armhf install ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev:armhf cmake
>>
>> does that work better? Note the arch qualified suffix ":armhf" on the
>> ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev.
>
> This gets me into http://paste.ubuntu.com/6583849/
>
On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app
>>> in the store has one published version and that has u
On 12/13/2013 11:58 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to
> cross-compile CMake based projects:
>
Awesome!
...
>
> With chroots managed by click: one can simply use "cmake ../; make" direct.
>
> This together with a working emulator complet
On 12/16/2013 04:28 PM, Thomas Voß wrote:
> I think the policy and guideline is pretty simple: For every new
> project that Canonical is upstream for, we will default to CMake
> (language/runtime-specific build systems aside). With that, all
> developers benefit from cross-build support and best po
Hi Dimitri,
thanks for explaining things so clearly!
On 12/16/2013 04:54 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
[...]
> There is no technical limitation, why a qmake binary cannot be adapted
> to read all configuration & qmake modules from a configurable location
> at runtime, instead of hard-coded one
On 16 December 2013 15:27, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each ap
Hi
Thank you very much Roman, I am glad you like it :D
Bonjour José,
>
> I hope you are considering to offer localized version of your app.
> I'd be happy to coordinate the French translation for you.
> Transifex is a great translation platform/site. Check it out. I coordinate
> many software tra
On 13-12-16 11:05 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 15:27, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope
wrote:
>
>
> We ha
On 12/16/2013 10:05 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 15:27, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
...
>> Fat packages are being implemented for shipping multiple binaries for
>> different
>> architectures in a single click package and
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> To me it makes sense to support one version *per framework* per application.
> This gives power to the developer to support what he/she wants[1]. Support the
> latest framework only to always stay cutting edge-- fine, but you will likely
> have fewer
ng changes -
some related to changing background images. Let's see how it goes tomorrow.
Today, a quick list of tasks related to 'going green':
* ubuntu-weather-app (Nicholas):
Still flaky tests it seems - one failure on mako, two on maguro:
-
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:28:23 Thomas Voß wrote:
> I think the policy and guideline is pretty simple: For every new
> project that Canonical is upstream for, we will default to CMake
> (language/runtime-specific build systems aside). With that, all
> developers benefit from cross-build support
Hello,
Does someone can post 'ls' result under ubuntu rootfs?
I need to know if /system, /data (and some other) need to exist,
Regards
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help
lure:
>
> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/68:20131216:20131211.2/5483/gallery-app-autopilot/575353/
That’s a flaky test indeed, a MR that fixes it is pending review:
https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/gallery-app/wait-for-confirm-dialogue/+merge/199076
.
However it is blocke
Hey everyone,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Right, it might sound a bit scary indeed. The main thing that Didier
> wanted to say is that we want all the tests to be reliable.
I totally agree
> We no longer
> do re-runs in
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> * unity8 (Kevin):
> One failure on maguro. Is this still a random failure? I guess we need
> to push on that as well:
>
> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trust
On 16.12.2013 19:06, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote:
* unity8 (Kevin):
One failure on maguro. Is this still a random failure? I guess we need
to push on that as well:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/68:20131216:20131211.2/5485/unity8-autopilot/
That&#
//ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/maguro/68:20131216:20131211.2/5485/unity8-autopilot/
That'd be:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity8/+bug/1260860
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ub
On 16 December 2013 18:14, Michael Zanetti
wrote:
> On Monday 16 December 2013 15:28:23 Thomas Voß wrote:
>> I think the policy and guideline is pretty simple: For every new
>> project that Canonical is upstream for, we will default to CMake
>> (language/runtime-specific build systems aside). With
Hello,
On 16 December 2013 18:57, François Leblanc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does someone can post 'ls' result under ubuntu rootfs?
>
> I need to know if /system, /data (and some other) need to exist,
>
Depending on which mounting style is used, they should be.
E.g. in the system-image, flipped, styl
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> AFAIK, system-image and system-settings are not autopilot tested, but again
> it's not clear that such testing would have caught *this* issue. Not that
> autopiloting the upgrade sequence isn't still a good idea! We need to talk
> about tha
After update and upgrade, I can't use keyboard .How should i do ?
Chit Ko Ko Win
Ubuntu Myanmar LoCo Team
http://chitkoko.ubuntu-mm.net
EF49 DD71 FE8D 5656 9510
3ED4 1511 4B86 5F9B 9E63
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscr
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Saturday, 2013-12-14, 08:24:03, Thomas Voß wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>> > On 13 December 2013 22:25, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> >> So, what steps can be taken to avoid such problems in the futu
Hi,
starting from next Monday, December the 23rd until Jan the 6th, on vacation.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
47 matches
Mail list logo
